188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36018360)
1. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of outcomes.
Lee W; Song KB; Hong S; Park Y; Kwak BJ; Jun E; Hwang DW; Kim S; Lee JH; Kim SC
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):881-890. PubMed ID: 36018360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.
Uijterwijk BA; Lemmers DHL; Bolm L; Luyer M; Koh YX; Mazzola M; Webber L; Kazemier G; Bannone E; Ramaekers M; Ielpo B; Wellner U; Koek S; Giani A; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Ann Surg; 2023 Sep; 278(3):e570-e579. PubMed ID: 36730852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of postoperative complications and long-term oncological outcomes in minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Kim SH; Lee B; Hwang HK; Lee JS; Han HS; Lee WJ; Yoon YS; Kang CM
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Mar; 29(3):329-337. PubMed ID: 34717038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved outcomes with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with dilated pancreatic ducts: a prospective study.
Cos H; LeCompte MT; Srinivasa S; Zarate Rodriguez J; Woolsey CA; Williams G; Patel S; Khan A; Fields RC; Majella Doyle MB; Chapman WC; Strasberg SM; Hawkins WG; Hammill CW; Sanford DE
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3100-3109. PubMed ID: 34235587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term survival after minimally invasive resection versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Kamarajah SK; Gujjuri R; Bundred JR; Hilal MA; White SA
HPB (Oxford); 2021 Feb; 23(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 33077373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery: An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample.
Kiguchi G; Sugioka A; Uchida Y; Yoshikawa J; Nakauchi M; Kojima M; Tanahashi Y; Takahara T; Yasuda A; Suda K; Kato Y; Uyama I
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101577. PubMed ID: 33887674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Yin SM; Liu YW; Liu YY; Yong CC; Wang CC; Li WF; Yeh CH
BMC Surg; 2021 Jan; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33494734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
Uijterwijk BA; Kasai M; Lemmers DHL; Chinnusamy P; van Hilst J; Ielpo B; Wei K; Song KB; Kim SC; Klompmaker S; Jang JY; Herremans KM; Bencini L; Coratti A; Mazzola M; Menon KV; Goh BKP; Qin R; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Aug; 408(1):311. PubMed ID: 37581763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?
Gumbs AA; Chouillard E; Abu Hilal M; Croner R; Gayet B; Gagner M
Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5256-5267. PubMed ID: 33146810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive approaches increase postoperative complications in obese patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy during the initial development period: a propensity score matching study.
Wei TH; Su PJ; Lu WH; Liao TK; Wang CJ; Lai CH; Chiu PH; Su PF; Chao YJ; Shan YS
Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2770-2780. PubMed ID: 36477639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients.
Nassour I; Wang SC; Christie A; Augustine MM; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Choti MA; Mansour JC; Xie XJ; Polanco PM; Minter RM
Ann Surg; 2018 Jul; 268(1):151-157. PubMed ID: 28486387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive vs open pancreatoduodenectomy on oncological adequacy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ashouri Y; Ho K; Ho H; Hsu CH; Ghaderi I; Riall TS; Konstantinidis IT; Maegawa FB
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7302-7311. PubMed ID: 35178590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms.
Bao PQ; Mazirka PO; Watkins KT
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Apr; 18(4):682-9. PubMed ID: 24234245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.
Chen K; Pan Y; Liu XL; Jiang GY; Wu D; Maher H; Cai XJ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 29169337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Operative Time on Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Williams MD; Bhama AR; Naffouje S; Kamarajah SK; Becerra AZ; Zhang Y; Pappas SG; Dahdaleh FS
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jan; 27(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36357742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang S; Shi N; You L; Dai M; Zhao Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e8619. PubMed ID: 29390259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: uncomplicated ends justify the means.
Naffouje SA; Pointer DT; Satyadi MA; Hodul P; Anaya DA; Pimiento J; Malafa M; Kim DW; Fleming JB; Denbo JW
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jul; 36(7):4912-4922. PubMed ID: 34859301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.
Xu S; Zhang XP; Zhao GD; Zou WB; Zhao ZM; Hu MG; Gao YX; Tan XL; Liu Q; Liu R
Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8237-8248. PubMed ID: 35534733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
