These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3602380)

  • 21. Influence of calibration materials in single- and dual-energy quantitative CT.
    Steenbeek JC; van Kuijk C; Grashuis JL
    Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):849-55. PubMed ID: 1584946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Material selective imaging and density measurement with the dual energy method. III. Determination of bone mineral of the spine with CT].
    Kalender W; Felsenberg D; Süss C
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1987 Dec; 7(4):170-6. PubMed ID: 3436119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modified method of spinal computed tomography for trabecular bone mineral measurements.
    Banks LM; Stevenson JC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1986; 10(3):463-7. PubMed ID: 3700751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Experimental studies on the accuracy of mineral content assessment in spongiosa bone using quantitative CT (single energy measurement)].
    Rohloff R; Hitzler H; Arndt W; Frey KW
    Rofo; 1985 Dec; 143(6):692-7. PubMed ID: 3001863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An anthropomorphic phantom study on the effect of midvertebral slice placement and region-of-interest positioning on the reproducibility of single-energy quantitative CT (QCT) of the spine.
    Schmitz SA; Felsenberg D; Letzner E; Wolf KJ
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(6):932-7. PubMed ID: 9843236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vertebral mineral status: assessment with single- versus multi-section CT.
    Lambiase R; Sartoris DJ; Fellingham L; Andre M; Resnick D
    Radiology; 1987 Jul; 164(1):231-6. PubMed ID: 3588911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spinal bone mineral density measured with quantitative CT: effect of region of interest, vertebral level, and technique.
    Steiger P; Block JE; Steiger S; Heuck AF; Friedlander A; Ettinger B; Harris ST; Glüer CC; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1990 May; 175(2):537-43. PubMed ID: 2326479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computed tomographic assessment of vertebral bone mineral in childhood.
    Fredericks BJ; de Campo JF; Sephton R; McCredie DA
    Skeletal Radiol; 1990; 19(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 2321051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bone mineral measurement: automated determination of midvertebral CT section.
    Kalender WA; Brestowsky H; Felsenberg D
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):219-21. PubMed ID: 3380963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vertebral bone mineral measurement using dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.
    Eriksson S; Isberg B; Lindgren U
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 2964852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measurement of trabecular bone mineral by dual energy computed tomography.
    Adams JE; Chen SZ; Adams PH; Isherwood I
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1982 Jun; 6(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 7096705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Local differences in mineral content in vertebral trabecular bone measured by dual-energy computed tomography.
    Nepper-Rasmussen J; Mosekilde L
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):369-71. PubMed ID: 2775598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prediction of the compressive strength of vertebral bodies of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography.
    Biggemann M; Hilweg D; Brinckmann P
    Skeletal Radiol; 1988; 17(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 3212488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of bone mineral. Part 2.
    Wahner HW; Dunn WL; Riggs BL
    J Nucl Med; 1984 Nov; 25(11):1241-53. PubMed ID: 6387065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Osteoporosis: assessment by quantitative computed tomography.
    Genant HK; Ettinger B; Cann CE; Reiser U; Gordan GS; Kolb FO
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1985 Jul; 16(3):557-68. PubMed ID: 3892413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vivo analysis of single, pre- and postprocessing quantitative CT techniques.
    Reinus WR; Hardy DC
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Jan; 23(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 3338898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improved accuracy of single-energy computed tomography bone mineral determination using threshold analysis.
    Reinus WR; Nadel S
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jun; 22(6):484-9. PubMed ID: 3623852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CT vertebral bone mineral measurement--intrinsic errors of single KV.
    Mahaworasilpa T; Southon FC
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1986; 9(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 3729816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trabecular bone density in the proximal femur: quantitative CT assessment. Work in progress.
    Sartoris DJ; André M; Resnik CS; Resnick D
    Radiology; 1986 Sep; 160(3):707-12. PubMed ID: 3755536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A postprocessing dual energy technique for vertebral CT densitometry.
    Laval-Jeantet AM; Cann CE; Roger B; Dallant P
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1984 Dec; 8(6):1164-7. PubMed ID: 6501625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.