These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3602428)

  • 1. Dose intercomparison at the radiotherapy centres in The Netherlands. 1. Photon beams under reference conditions and for prostatic cancer treatment.
    Wittkämper FW; Mijnheer BJ; van Kleffens HJ
    Radiother Oncol; 1987 May; 9(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 3602428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A dosimetric intercomparison of kilovoltage X-rays, megavoltage photons and electrons in the Republic of Ireland.
    Nisbet A; Thwaites DI; Sheridan ME
    Radiother Oncol; 1998 Jul; 48(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 9756178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A dosimetric intercomparison of megavoltage photon beams in UK radiotherapy centres.
    Thwaites DI; Williams JR; Aird EG; Klevenhagen SC; Williams PC
    Phys Med Biol; 1992 Feb; 37(2):445-61. PubMed ID: 1553393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric intercomparison at the Scandinavian radiation therapy centres. I. Absorbed dose intercomparison.
    Johansson KA; Mattsson LO; Svensson H
    Acta Radiol Oncol; 1982; 21(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6283791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional dose distribution of tangential breast treatment: a national dosimetry intercomparison.
    van Bree NA; van Battum LJ; Huizenga H; Mijnheer BJ
    Radiother Oncol; 1991 Dec; 22(4):252-60. PubMed ID: 1792317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose intercomparison at the radiotherapy centers in The Netherlands. 3. Characteristics of electron beams.
    Wittkämper FW; Mijnheer BJ
    Radiother Oncol; 1993 May; 27(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 8356226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The EQUAL-ESTRO external quality control laboratory in France].
    Roué A; Van Dam J; Dutreix A; Svensson H
    Cancer Radiother; 2004 Nov; 8 Suppl 1():S44-9. PubMed ID: 15679246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetric intercomparison for two Australasian clinical trials using an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kron T; Hamilton C; Roff M; Denham J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Feb; 52(2):566-79. PubMed ID: 11872306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance network in central Europe. External audit on output calibration for photon beams.
    Izewska J; Novotny J; Gwiazdowska B; Kindlova A; Kontra G; van Dam J; Dutreix A; van der Schueren E
    Acta Oncol; 1995; 34(6):829-38. PubMed ID: 7576752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of precision thermoluminescence dosimetry for intercomparison of absorbed dose.
    Rossiter MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1975 Sep; 20(3):735-46. PubMed ID: 1187775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dosimetric quality audit of photon beams by the Belgian Hospital Physicist Association.
    Hoornaert MT; Van Dam J; Vynckier S; Bouiller A
    Radiother Oncol; 1993 Jul; 28(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8234868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality audit of megavoltage radiotherapy units: intercomparison of dose at a reference point using a mailed TL-dosimetry system.
    Davis B; Faessler P
    Radiother Oncol; 1993 Jul; 28(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 8234874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Swiss IMRT dosimetry intercomparison using a thorax phantom.
    Schiefer H; Fogliata A; Nicolini G; Cozzi L; Seelentag WW; Born E; Hasenbalg F; Roth J; Schnekenburger B; Münch-Berndl K; Vallet V; Pachoud M; Reiner B; Dipasquale G; Krusche B; Fix MK
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4424-31. PubMed ID: 20879601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality control of radiotherapy centres in Europe: beam calibration.
    Dutreix A; Derreumaux S; Chavaudra J; van der Schueren E
    Radiother Oncol; 1994 Sep; 32(3):256-64. PubMed ID: 7816944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Energy correction factors of LiF powder TLDs irradiated in high-energy electron beams and applied to mailed dosimetry for quality assurance networks.
    Marre D; Ferreira IH; Bridier A; Björeland A; Svensson H; Dutreix A; Chavaudra J
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Dec; 45(12):3657-74. PubMed ID: 11131191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. TLD postal dose intercomparison for megavoltage units in Poland.
    Izewska J; Gajewski R; Gwiazdowska B; Kania M; Rostkowska J
    Radiother Oncol; 1995 Aug; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 7501812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The quality dependence of LiF TLD in megavoltage photon beams: Monte Carlo simulation and experiments.
    Mobit PN; Mayles P; Nahum AE
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Mar; 41(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 8778821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calibration of photon and electron beams with an extrapolation chamber.
    Zankowski CE; Podgorsak EB
    Med Phys; 1997 Apr; 24(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 9127299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planning, computer optimization, and dosimetric verification of a segmented irradiation technique for prostate cancer.
    Damen EM; Brugmans MJ; van der Horst A; Bos L; Lebesque JV; Mijnheer BJ; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Kessler ML
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(4):1183-95. PubMed ID: 11240262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postal intercomparison of absorbed dose for high energy x rays with thermoluminescence dosimeters.
    Bjärngard BE; Kase KR; Rudén BI; Biggs PJ; Boyer AL; Johansson KA
    Med Phys; 1980; 7(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 6775180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.