These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36026612)

  • 21. Kinematics of inboard-leaning occupants in frontal impacts.
    Donlon JP; Richardson R; Jayathirtha M; Forman J; Kerrigan J; Kent R; Arbogast KB; Maripudi V; Scavnicky M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(4):272-277. PubMed ID: 32315202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pretensioner loading to rear-seat occupants during static and dynamic testing.
    Bohman K; Fredriksson R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S111-8. PubMed ID: 25307375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimizing Seat Belt and Airbag Designs for Rear Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes.
    Hu J; Reed MP; Rupp JD; Fischer K; Lange P; Adler A
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2017 Nov; 61():67-100. PubMed ID: 29394436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Kinematics of pediatric crash dummies seated on vehicle seats with realistic belt geometry.
    Klinich KD; Reed MP; Ebert SM; Rupp JD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(8):866-74. PubMed ID: 24884476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluations of pretensioner activation in rear impacts.
    Parenteau CS; Viano DC; Burnett RA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(7):553-558. PubMed ID: 34355979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Restraint systems considering occupant diversity and pre-crash posture.
    Boyle K; Fanta A; Reed MP; Fischer K; Smith A; Adler A; Hu J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S31-S36. PubMed ID: 33709859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adapting load limiter deployment for frontal crash diversity.
    Ekambaram K; Frampton R; Jackson L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S43-S49. PubMed ID: 31906716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of an integrated safety system for swivel seat arrangements in frontal crash.
    Li Z; Gao R; McCoy R; Hu H; He L; Gao Z
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1153265. PubMed ID: 37077231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Human occupants in low-speed frontal sled tests: effects of pre-impact bracing on chest compression, reaction forces, and subject acceleration.
    Kemper AR; Beeman SM; Madigan ML; Duma SM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S141-50. PubMed ID: 25307379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biofidelic Evaluation of the Large Omni-Directional Child Anthropomorphic Test Device in Low Speed Loading Conditions.
    Seacrist T; Maheshwari J; Graci V; Holt CM; Akkem R; Chingas G; Douglas EC; Griffith M; Palumbo AJ
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2019 Nov; 63():213-234. PubMed ID: 32311058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Occupant Kinematics in Simulated Autonomous Driving Vehicle Collisions: Influence of Seating Position, Direction and Angle.
    Kitagawa Y; Hayashi S; Yamada K; Gotoh M
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2017 Nov; 61():101-155. PubMed ID: 29394437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of the performance of two advanced restraint systems in frontal impacts.
    Lopez-Valdes FJ; Juste O; Pipkorn B; Garcia-Muñoz I; Sunnevång C; Dahlgren M; Alba JJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S119-25. PubMed ID: 25307376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of seat pan and pelvis angles on the occupant response in a reclined position during a frontal crash.
    Grébonval C; Trosseille X; Petit P; Wang X; Beillas P
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257292. PubMed ID: 34543333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Second-row occupant responses with and without intrusion in rear sled and crash tests.
    Parenteau CS; Viano DC; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 33289580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The common characteristics and behaviors of child occupants in motor vehicle travel.
    Cross SL; Koppel S; Arbogast KB; Bohman K; Rudin-Brown CM; Charlton JL
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(7):713-719. PubMed ID: 31567027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison across vehicles of passenger head kinematics in abrupt vehicle maneuvers.
    Reed MP; Ebert SM; Jones MLH; Park BD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S128-S132. PubMed ID: 31800326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Occupant restraint in the rear seat: ATD responses to standard and pre-tensioning, force-limiting belt restraints.
    Forman J; Michaelson J; Kent R; Kuppa S; Bostrom O
    Ann Adv Automot Med; 2008 Oct; 52():141-54. PubMed ID: 19026231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Head impact contact points for restrained child occupants.
    Arbogast KB; Wozniak S; Locey CM; Maltese MR; Zonfrillo MR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 22458796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fatal side impact crash scenarios for rear seat and seat belt-restrained occupants from vulnerable populations.
    Fein SM; Jermakian JS; Arbogast KB; Maltese MR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S50-S56. PubMed ID: 31381380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of kinematics and injuries to restrained occupants in far-side crashes using full-scale vehicle and human body models.
    Arun MW; Umale S; Humm JR; Yoganandan N; Hadagali P; Pintar FA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():116-23. PubMed ID: 27586112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.