177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36026703)
21. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer.
Yang CM; Lim DH; Kim HJ; Chung TY
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223114. PubMed ID: 31603903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer.
Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems.
Calvo-Sanz JA; Portero-Benito A; Arias-Puente A
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 256(3):559-566. PubMed ID: 29392397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Agreement of intraocular lens power calculation between 2 SS-OCT-based biometers.
Pfaeffli OA; Weber A; Hoffer KJ; Savini G; Baenninger PB; Thiel MA; Taroni L; Müller L
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 May; 48(5):535-541. PubMed ID: 34417784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.
Hua Y; Qiu W; Xiao Q; Wu Q
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193023. PubMed ID: 29486009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Repeatability and Agreement of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer IOLMaster 700 Versus a Scheimpflug Imaging-Based Biometer AL-Scan in Cataract Patients.
Chan TCY; Wan KH; Tang FY; Wang YM; Yu M; Cheung C
Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Jan; 46(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 30985487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.
Oh R; Oh JY; Choi HJ; Kim MK; Yoon CH
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 33504333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of two new integrated SS-OCT tomography and biometry devices.
Sorkin N; Achiron A; Abumanhal M; Abulafia A; Cohen E; Gutfreund S; Mandelblum J; Varssano D; Levinger E
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1277-1284. PubMed ID: 35608316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of an upgraded optical biometer with 2 validated optical biometers.
Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Jul; 47(7):859-864. PubMed ID: 33577278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Split-Window OCT biometry in pseudophakic eyes.
Sikorski BL; Hoffer KJ
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 100(8):e1685-e1690. PubMed ID: 35670319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry.
Hoffer KJ; Hoffmann PC; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.
Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of orthokeratology on precision and agreement assessment of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer.
Shu B; Bao F; Savini G; Lu W; Tu R; Chen H; Song B; Wang Q; Huang J
Eye Vis (Lond); 2020; 7():13. PubMed ID: 32161772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of axial length using a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer - ARGOS with partial coherence interferometry- based biometer -IOLMaster among school children.
Hussaindeen JR; Mariam EG; Arunachalam S; Bhavatharini R; Gopalakrishnan A; Narayanan A; Agarkar S; Sivaraman V
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209356. PubMed ID: 30589874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ocular measurements of a swept-source biometer: Repeatability data and comparison with an optical low-coherence interferometry biometer.
Nemeth G; Modis L
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 45(6):789-797. PubMed ID: 30850124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Precision of a New Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomographer and Its Comparison With a Swept-Source OCT-Based Optical Biometer in Patients With Cataract.
Wang Q; Chen M; Ning R; Savini G; Wang Y; Zhang T; Lin X; Chen X; Huang J
J Refract Surg; 2021 Sep; 37(9):616-622. PubMed ID: 34506238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of a New All-in-One Optical Biometer and Comparison With a Validated Swept-source OCT Biometer.
Li Y; Zou Z; Xu S; Yu J; Ye Q; Li K; Xiao Y; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Yao M; Huang J
J Refract Surg; 2023 Dec; 39(12):825-830. PubMed ID: 38063829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The repeatability and agreement of biometric measurements by dual Scheimpflug device with integrated optical biometer.
Hashemi H; Sardari S; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M
Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7748. PubMed ID: 35546610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Agreement between intraoperative anterior segment spectral-domain OCT and 2 swept-source OCT biometers.
Tañá-Sanz P; Ruiz-Santos M; Rodríguez-Carrillo MD; Aguilar-Córcoles S; Montés-Micó R; Tañá-Rivero P
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Apr; 18(4):387-393. PubMed ID: 33730515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
