218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36028638)
1. X-ray attenuation of bone, soft and adipose tissue in CT from 70 to 140 kV and comparison with 3D printable additive manufacturing materials.
Ma X; Figl M; Unger E; Buschmann M; Homolka P
Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):14580. PubMed ID: 36028638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of X-Ray Attenuation Properties of Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Materials Using Computed Tomography From 70 to 140 kVp.
Ma X; Buschmann M; Unger E; Homolka P
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():763960. PubMed ID: 34912790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tailoring the Mass Density of 3D Printing Materials for Accurate X-ray Imaging Simulation by Controlled Underfilling for Radiographic Phantoms.
Ahmed AMM; Buschmann M; Breyer L; Kuntner C; Homolka P
Polymers (Basel); 2024 Apr; 16(8):. PubMed ID: 38675035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tissue equivalence of 3D printing materials with respect to attenuation and absorption of X-rays used for diagnostic and interventional imaging.
Kunert P; Trinkl S; Giussani A; Reichert D; Brix G
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7766-7778. PubMed ID: 36121424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodology for computed tomography characterization of commercially available 3D printing materials for use in radiology/radiation oncology.
Kozee M; Weygand J; Andreozzi JM; Hunt D; Perez BA; Graham JA; Redler G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 24(6):e13999. PubMed ID: 37096305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D printed patient-specific thorax phantom with realistic heterogenous bone radiopacity using filament printer technology.
Hatamikia S; Kronreif G; Unger A; Oberoi G; Jaksa L; Unger E; Koschitz S; Gulyas I; Irnstorfer N; Buschmann M; Kettenbach J; Birkfellner W; Lorenz A
Z Med Phys; 2022 Nov; 32(4):438-452. PubMed ID: 35221154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproduction of a conventional anthropomorphic female chest phantom by 3D-printing: Comparison of image contrasts and absorbed doses in CT.
Kunert P; Schlattl H; Trinkl S; Giussani A; Klein L; Janich M; Reichert D; Brix G
Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):4734-4743. PubMed ID: 37415411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A voxel-by-voxel method for mixing two filaments during a 3D printing process for soft-tissue replication in an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
Okkalidis N; Bliznakova K
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Dec; 67(24):. PubMed ID: 36541511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. HU deviation in lung and bone tissues: Characterization and a corrective strategy.
Ai HA; Meier JG; Wendt RE
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2108-2118. PubMed ID: 29574856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of x-ray spectra for CT.
Kalender WA; Deak P; Kellermeier M; van Straten M; Vollmar SV
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):993-1007. PubMed ID: 19378760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A filament 3D printing approach for CT-compatible bone tissues replication.
Okkalidis N; Bliznakova K; Kolev N
Phys Med; 2022 Oct; 102():96-102. PubMed ID: 36162230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of Three-dimensional Printing Materials for Printing Aorta Model Replicating Type B Aortic Dissection.
Wu CA; Squelch A; Sun Z
Curr Med Imaging; 2021; 17(7):843-849. PubMed ID: 33602103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A customizable anthropomorphic phantom for dosimetric verification of 3D-printed lung, tissue, and bone density materials.
Tino RB; Yeo AU; Brandt M; Leary M; Kron T
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):52-69. PubMed ID: 34796527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suitability of low density materials for 3D printing of physical breast phantoms.
Ivanov D; Bliznakova K; Buliev I; Popov P; Mettivier G; Russo P; Di Lillo F; Sarno A; Vignero J; Bosmans H; Bravin A; Bliznakov Z
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(17):175020. PubMed ID: 29999497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D-printed iodine-ink CT phantom for radiomics feature extraction - advantages and challenges.
Bach M; Aberle C; Depeursinge A; Jimenez-Del-Toro O; Schaer R; Flouris K; Konukoglu E; Müller H; Stieltjes B; Obmann MM
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5682-5697. PubMed ID: 36945890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thermoplastic 3D printing technology using a single filament for producing realistic patient-derived breast models.
Dukov N; Bliznakova K; Okkalidis N; Teneva T; Encheva E; Bliznakov Z
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(4):. PubMed ID: 35038693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Liquid tissue surrogates for X-ray and CT phantom studies.
FitzGerald PF; Colborn RE; Edic PM; Lambert JW; Bonitatibus PJ; Yeh BM
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6251-6260. PubMed ID: 28986933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design and fabrication of 3D-printed patient-specific soft tissue and bone phantoms for CT imaging.
Mei K; Pasyar P; Geagan M; Liu LP; Shapira N; Gang GJ; Stayman JW; Noël PB
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17495. PubMed ID: 37840044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional printing CT-derived objects with controllable radiopacity.
Hamedani BA; Melvin A; Vaheesan K; Gadani S; Pereira K; Hall AF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):317-328. PubMed ID: 29411529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical Note: Accurate replication of soft and bone tissues with 3D printing.
Okkalidis N; Marinakis G
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2206-2211. PubMed ID: 32068889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
