283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36028865)
21. Development of Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms for Girls with Suspected Central Precocious Puberty: Retrospective Study.
Pan L; Liu G; Mao X; Li H; Zhang J; Liang H; Li X
JMIR Med Inform; 2019 Feb; 7(1):e11728. PubMed ID: 30747712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Seasonal prediction of daily PM
Wu Y; Lin S; Shi K; Ye Z; Fang Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(30):45821-45836. PubMed ID: 35150424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Machine Learning Model Based on Health Records for Predicting Recurrence After Microwave Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
An C; Yang H; Yu X; Han ZY; Cheng Z; Liu F; Dou J; Li B; Li Y; Li Y; Yu J; Liang P
J Hepatocell Carcinoma; 2022; 9():671-684. PubMed ID: 35923613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Explainable machine learning to predict long-term mortality in critically ill ventilated patients: a retrospective study in central Taiwan.
Chan MC; Pai KC; Su SA; Wang MS; Wu CL; Chao WC
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Mar; 22(1):75. PubMed ID: 35337303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Feature selection for global tropospheric ozone prediction based on the BO-XGBoost-RFE algorithm.
Zhang B; Zhang Y; Jiang X
Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9244. PubMed ID: 35655087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Interpretable Machine Learning Methods for Monitoring Polymer Degradation in Extrusion of Polylactic Acid.
Munir N; McMorrow R; Mulrennan K; Whitaker D; McLoone S; Kellomäki M; Talvitie E; Lyyra I; McAfee M
Polymers (Basel); 2023 Aug; 15(17):. PubMed ID: 37688192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Visualizing the Interpretation of a Criteria-Driven System That Automatically Evaluates the Quality of Health News: Exploratory Study of 2 Approaches.
Liu X; Alsghaier H; Tong L; Ataullah A; McRoy S
JMIR AI; 2022 Dec; 1(1):e37751. PubMed ID: 38875559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A combined strategy of feature selection and machine learning to identify predictors of prediabetes.
De Silva K; Jönsson D; Demmer RT
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Mar; 27(3):396-406. PubMed ID: 31889178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Novel Application of Machine Learning Algorithms and Model-Agnostic Methods to Identify Factors Influencing Childhood Blood Lead Levels.
Liu X; Taylor MP; Aelion CM; Dong C
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Oct; 55(19):13387-13399. PubMed ID: 34546733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Machine learning algorithms to predict early pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with fetal heart rate as a strong predictor.
Liu L; Jiao Y; Li X; Ouyang Y; Shi D
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105624. PubMed ID: 32623348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An interpretable machine learning approach based on DNN, SVR, Extra Tree, and XGBoost models for predicting daily pan evaporation.
El Bilali A; Abdeslam T; Ayoub N; Lamane H; Ezzaouini MA; Elbeltagi A
J Environ Manage; 2023 Feb; 327():116890. PubMed ID: 36459782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. On the interpretability of machine learning methods in crash frequency modeling and crash modification factor development.
Wen X; Xie Y; Jiang L; Li Y; Ge T
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Apr; 168():106617. PubMed ID: 35202941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Comparison of XGBoost, Random Forest, and Nomograph for the Prediction of Disease Severity in Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia: Implications of Cytokine and Immune Cell Profile.
Hong W; Zhou X; Jin S; Lu Y; Pan J; Lin Q; Yang S; Xu T; Basharat Z; Zippi M; Fiorino S; Tsukanov V; Stock S; Grottesi A; Chen Q; Pan J
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2022; 12():819267. PubMed ID: 35493729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Machine learning models outperform deep learning models, provide interpretation and facilitate feature selection for soybean trait prediction.
Gill M; Anderson R; Hu H; Bennamoun M; Petereit J; Valliyodan B; Nguyen HT; Batley J; Bayer PE; Edwards D
BMC Plant Biol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):180. PubMed ID: 35395721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Machine Learning for the Prediction of Complications in Patients After Mitral Valve Surgery.
Jiang H; Liu L; Wang Y; Ji H; Ma X; Wu J; Huang Y; Wang X; Gui R; Zhao Q; Chen B
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2021; 8():771246. PubMed ID: 34977184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Prediction of effective sociodemographic variables in modeling health literacy: A machine learning approach.
İnceoğlu F; Deniz S; Yagin FH
Int J Med Inform; 2023 Oct; 178():105167. PubMed ID: 37572386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Enhancing interpretability of automatically extracted machine learning features: application to a RBM-Random Forest system on brain lesion segmentation.
Pereira S; Meier R; McKinley R; Wiest R; Alves V; Silva CA; Reyes M
Med Image Anal; 2018 Feb; 44():228-244. PubMed ID: 29289703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicting Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Heart Failure Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Li J; Liu S; Hu Y; Zhu L; Mao Y; Liu J
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Aug; 24(8):e38082. PubMed ID: 35943767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prediction of red blood cell transfusion after orthopedic surgery using an interpretable machine learning framework.
Chen Y; Cai X; Cao Z; Lin J; Huang W; Zhuang Y; Xiao L; Guan X; Wang Y; Xia X; Jiao F; Du X; Jiang G; Wang D
Front Surg; 2023; 10():1047558. PubMed ID: 36936651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A machine learning approach to personalized predictors of dyslipidemia: a cohort study.
Gutiérrez-Esparza G; Pulido T; Martínez-García M; Ramírez-delReal T; Groves-Miralrio LE; Márquez-Murillo MF; Amezcua-Guerra LM; Vargas-Alarcón G; Hernández-Lemus E
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1213926. PubMed ID: 37799151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
