119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36030664)
1. Machine learning framework for automatic image quality evaluation involving a mammographic American College of Radiology phantom.
Ho PS; Hwang YS; Tsai HY
Phys Med; 2022 Oct; 102():1-8. PubMed ID: 36030664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of wavelets to the evaluation of phantom images for mammography quality control.
Alvarez M; Pina DR; Miranda JR; Duarte SB
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):7177-90. PubMed ID: 23060095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized quantitative evaluation of mammographic accreditation phantom images.
Lee Y; Tsai DY; Shinohara N
Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6323-31. PubMed ID: 21302789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which phantom is better for assessing the image quality in full-field digital mammography?: American College of Radiology Accreditation phantom versus digital mammography accreditation phantom.
Song SE; Seo BK; Yie A; Ku BK; Kim HY; Cho KR; Chung HH; Lee SH; Hwang KW
Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(6):776-83. PubMed ID: 23118577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?
Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Scalzetti EM; Dance DR
Acad Radiol; 2002 Jul; 9(7):764-72. PubMed ID: 12139090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic Phantoms Frequently Used to Determine Image Quality: A Comparative Study.
AlKhalifah K; Brindabhan A
J Allied Health; 2017; 46(4):239-242. PubMed ID: 29202159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative versus subjective evaluation of mammography accreditation phantom images.
Chakraborty DP; Eckert MP
Med Phys; 1995 Feb; 22(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 7565344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated analysis of the American College of Radiology mammographic accreditation phantom images.
Brooks KW; Trueblood JH; Kearfott KJ; Lawton DT
Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):709-23. PubMed ID: 9167162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized scheme for evaluating mammographic phantom images.
Asahara M; Kodera Y
Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1609-17. PubMed ID: 22380393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of using the new American College of Radiology digital mammography phantom on quality survey in modern digital mammography systems: Evidence from nationwide surveys in Taiwan.
Hwang YS; Tsai HY; Lin YY; Liao YL
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():9-14. PubMed ID: 31307658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subjective evaluations of mammographic accreditation phantom images by three observer groups.
Brooks KW; Trueblood JH; Kearfott KJ
Invest Radiol; 1994 Jan; 29(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 8144336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between phantom failure rates and radiation dose in mammography accreditation.
Haus AG; Yaffe MJ; Feig SA; Hendrick RE; Butler PA; Wilcox PA; Bansal S
Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2297-301. PubMed ID: 11764036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inconsistencies of Microcalcification Specks in Phantoms Approved by the American College of Radiology for Mammography Accreditation.
Imamura K; Terada H; Hagiwara A; Higashida Y; Ehara N; Ohuchi N
Igaku Butsuri; 2000; 20(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 12764251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI): an application to the measurement of microcalcification image quality of directly acquired digital images.
Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1269-77. PubMed ID: 9284251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deep Learning Approaches for Automatic Quality Assurance of Magnetic Resonance Images Using ACR Phantom.
Torfeh T; Aouadi S; Yoganathan SA; Paloor S; Hammoud R; Al-Hammadi N
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Nov; 23(1):197. PubMed ID: 38031032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated daily quality control analysis for mammography in a multi-unit imaging center.
Sundell VM; Mäkelä T; Meaney A; Kaasalainen T; Savolainen S
Acta Radiol; 2019 Feb; 60(2):140-148. PubMed ID: 29768928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Convolutional neural network -based phantom image scoring for mammography quality control.
Sundell VM; Mäkelä T; Vitikainen AM; Kaasalainen T
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Dec; 22(1):216. PubMed ID: 36476319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliable quality assurance of X-ray mammography scanner by evaluation the standard mammography phantom image using an interpretable deep learning model.
Oh JH; Kim HG; Lee KM; Ryu CW
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 154():110369. PubMed ID: 35691109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of computer assisted assessment of image quality index for mammographic phantom images.
Mayo P; Rodenas F; Verdú G; Villaescusa JI; Campayo JM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):620-3. PubMed ID: 16604712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computerized evaluation of mammographic image quality using phantom images.
Dougherty G
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1998; 22(5):365-73. PubMed ID: 9890181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
