These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36030707)
21. Comparison of stepping-based metrics from ActiGraph accelerometers worn concurrently on the non-dominant wrist and waist among young adults. Buchan DS J Sports Sci; 2024 Sep; 42(17):1664-1672. PubMed ID: 39369332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validity of smartphones and activity trackers to measure steps in a free-living setting over three consecutive days. Höchsmann C; Knaier R; Infanger D; Schmidt-Trucksäss A Physiol Meas; 2020 Jan; 41(1):015001. PubMed ID: 31851949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X. Mikkelsen MK; Berg-Beckhoff G; Frederiksen P; Horgan G; O'Driscoll R; Palmeira AL; Scott SE; Stubbs J; Heitmann BL; Larsen SC PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234426. PubMed ID: 32525912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validity of activity wristbands for estimating daily physical activity in primary schoolchildren under free-living conditions: School-Fit study. Mayorga-Vega D; Casado-Robles C; Guijarro-Romero S; Viciana J Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1211237. PubMed ID: 37554735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validity of activity trackers, smartphones, and phone applications to measure steps in various walking conditions. Höchsmann C; Knaier R; Eymann J; Hintermann J; Infanger D; Schmidt-Trucksäss A Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2018 Jul; 28(7):1818-1827. PubMed ID: 29460319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of free-living physical activity measurements between ActiGraph GT3X-BT and Fitbit Charge 3 in young people with haemophilia. Matlary RED; Holme PA; Glosli H; Rueegg CS; Grydeland M Haemophilia; 2022 Nov; 28(6):e172-e180. PubMed ID: 35830613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comprehensive comparison of Apple Watch and Fitbit monitors in a free-living setting. Bai Y; Tompkins C; Gell N; Dione D; Zhang T; Byun W PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251975. PubMed ID: 34038458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Low-Cost Consumer-Based Trackers to Measure Physical Activity and Sleep Duration Among Adults in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study. Degroote L; Hamerlinck G; Poels K; Maher C; Crombez G; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Vandendriessche A; Curtis RG; DeSmet A JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 May; 8(5):e16674. PubMed ID: 32282332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables. Henriksen A; Haugen Mikalsen M; Woldaregay AZ; Muzny M; Hartvigsen G; Hopstock LA; Grimsgaard S J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e110. PubMed ID: 29567635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of step outputs for waist and wrist accelerometer attachment sites. Tudor-Locke C; Barreira TV; Schuna JM Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Apr; 47(4):839-42. PubMed ID: 25121517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effects of step-count monitoring interventions on physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based randomised controlled trials in adults. Chaudhry UAR; Wahlich C; Fortescue R; Cook DG; Knightly R; Harris T Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Oct; 17(1):129. PubMed ID: 33036635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in breast and colorectal cancer survivors. De Groef A; Asnong A; Blondeel A; Ginis P; Nieuwboer A; De Vrieze T; Devoogdt N; Troosters T; Demeyer H; Geraerts I Support Care Cancer; 2023 Sep; 31(10):596. PubMed ID: 37768403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validity of Commercial Activity Trackers in Children With Congenital Heart Disease. Voss C; Gardner RF; Dean PH; Harris KC Can J Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 33(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 28347581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reliability and validity of two fitness tracker devices in the laboratory and home environment for older community-dwelling people. Burton E; Hill KD; Lautenschlager NT; Thøgersen-Ntoumani C; Lewin G; Boyle E; Howie E BMC Geriatr; 2018 May; 18(1):103. PubMed ID: 29724191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Straiton N; Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gullick J; Bhindi R; Gallagher R Maturitas; 2018 Jun; 112():85-93. PubMed ID: 29704922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Heart Rate Measures From Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in a Laboratory and Free-Living Setting: Validation Study. Müller AM; Wang NX; Yao J; Tan CS; Low ICC; Lim N; Tan J; Tan A; Müller-Riemenschneider F JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Oct; 7(10):e14120. PubMed ID: 31579026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X. Knaier R; Höchsmann C; Infanger D; Hinrichs T; Schmidt-Trucksäss A BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparability and feasibility of wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers in free-living adolescents. Scott JJ; Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Morgan PJ; Plotnikoff RC; Lubans DR J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28501418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps? An HS; Jones GC; Kang SK; Welk GJ; Lee JM Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Apr; 17(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 27912681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]