These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. High-Definition Colonoscopy Compared With Cuff- and Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy: Results From a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial. Desai M; Rex DK; Bohm ME; Davitkov P; DeWitt JM; Fischer M; Faulx G; Heath R; Imler TD; James-Stevenson TN; Kahi CJ; Kessler WR; Kohli DR; McHenry L; Rai T; Rogers NA; Sagi SV; Sathyamurthy A; Vennalaganti P; Sundaram S; Patel H; Higbee A; Kennedy K; Lahr R; Stojadinovikj G; Dasari C; Parasa S; Faulx A; Sharma P Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Sep; 20(9):2023-2031.e6. PubMed ID: 34979245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Endocuff use on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Triantafyllou K; Gkolfakis P; Tziatzios G; Papanikolaou IS; Fuccio L; Hassan C World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(9):1158-1170. PubMed ID: 30863002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study. De Palma GD; Giglio MC; Bruzzese D; Gennarelli N; Maione F; Siciliano S; Manzo B; Cassese G; Luglio G Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jan; 87(1):232-240. PubMed ID: 28082115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adenoma and serrated lesion detection with distal attachment in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Jaensch C; Jepsen MH; Christiansen DH; Madsen AH; Madsen MR Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):1-9. PubMed ID: 35141776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Full-spectrum (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme. Hassan C; Senore C; Radaelli F; De Pretis G; Sassatelli R; Arrigoni A; Manes G; Amato A; Anderloni A; Armelao F; Mondardini A; Spada C; Omazzi B; Cavina M; Miori G; Campanale C; Sereni G; Segnan N; Repici A Gut; 2017 Nov; 66(11):1949-1955. PubMed ID: 27507903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques. Coghlan E; Laferrere L; Zenon E; Marini JM; Rainero G; San Roman A; Posadas Martinez ML; Nadales A Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1200-1205. PubMed ID: 31144121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New-Generation High-Definition Colonoscopes Increase Adenoma Detection when Screening a Moderate-Risk Population for Colorectal Cancer. Bond A; O'Toole P; Fisher G; Subramanian S; Haslam N; Probert C; Cox T; Sarkar S Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Mar; 16(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 27528514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved adenoma detection by a novel distal attachment device-assisted colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hong SW; Hong HS; Kim K; Oh K; Lee JY; Park JH; Hwang SW; Park SH; Yang DH; Ye BD; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Byeon JS Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Sep; 96(3):543-552.e1. PubMed ID: 35500658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adenoma detection by Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy in an organized screening program: the "ItaVision" randomized controlled trial. Zorzi M; Hassan C; Battagello J; Antonelli G; Pantalena M; Bulighin G; Alicante S; Meggiato T; Rosa-Rizzotto E; Iacopini F; Luigiano C; Monica F; Arrigoni A; Germanà B; Valiante F; Mallardi B; Senore C; Grazzini G; Mantellini P; Endoscopy; 2022 Feb; 54(2):138-147. PubMed ID: 33524994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients. Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Second-generation distal attachment cuff improves adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patel HK; Chandrasekar VT; Srinivasan S; Patel SK; Dasari CS; Singh M; Le Cam E; Spadaccini M; Rex D; Sharma P Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Mar; 93(3):544-553.e7. PubMed ID: 33031786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of adenoma miss rate and adenoma detection rate between conventional colonoscopy and colonoscopy with second-generation distal attachment cuff: a multicenter, randomized, back-to-back trial. van Keulen KE; Papanikolaou IS; Mak TWC; Apostolopoulos P; Neumann H; Delconte G; Furnari M; Peters Y; Lau JYW; Polymeros D; Schrauwen RWN; Cavalcoli F; Koukoulioti E; Triantafyllou K; Anderson JC; Pohl H; Rex DK; Siersema PD Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 May; 99(5):798-808.e3. PubMed ID: 37993062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of the endoscopic device Endocuff™/Endocuff vision™ on quality standards in colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Walls M; Houwen BBSL; Rice S; Seager A; Dekker E; Sharp L; Rees CJ Colorectal Dis; 2023 Apr; 25(4):573-585. PubMed ID: 36471638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]