These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36032353)

  • 1. Distributing epistemic and practical risks: a comparative study of communicating earthquake damages.
    Yu LA
    Synthese; 2022; 200(5):360. PubMed ID: 36032353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epistemic and Non-epistemic Values in Earthquake Engineering.
    Zanetti L; Chiffi D; Petrini L
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2023 May; 29(3):18. PubMed ID: 37129748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does environmental science crowd out non-epistemic values?
    Gillette K; Inkpen SA; DesRoches CT
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Jun; 87():81-92. PubMed ID: 34111825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fairness in Knowing: Science Communication and Epistemic Justice.
    Medvecky F
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1393-1408. PubMed ID: 28939945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension.
    Barimah GK
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2024 May; 30(3):21. PubMed ID: 38789842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When do non-epistemic values play an epistemically illegitimate role in science? How to solve one half of the new demarcation problem.
    Reutlinger A
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Apr; 92():152-161. PubMed ID: 35182965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is "shared" in shared decision-making? Philosophical perspectives, epistemic justice, and implications for health professions education.
    Thomas A; Kuper A; Chin-Yee B; Park M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 26(2):409-418. PubMed ID: 32032468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Value-entanglement and the integrity of scientific research.
    Resnik DB; Elliott KC
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Jun; 75():1-11. PubMed ID: 31426942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Science, truth and dictatorship: Wishful thinking or wishful speaking?
    John S
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Dec; 78():64-72. PubMed ID: 31818420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of non-epistemic values in engineering models.
    Diekmann S; Peterson M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Mar; 19(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 21822897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hybrid regimes of knowledge? Challenges for constructing scientific evidence in the context of the GMO-debate.
    Böschen S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jul; 16(5):508-20. PubMed ID: 19452181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epistemic architecture: steering the public perception of the messy problem of antibiotic resistance.
    Nijsingh N; van Bergen A
    Emerg Top Life Sci; 2019 Nov; 3(6):737-740. PubMed ID: 32915224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Historical Epistemology: On the Diversity and Change of Epistemic Values in Science.
    Carrier M
    Ber Wiss; 2012 Sep; 35(3):239-251. PubMed ID: 33008188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science.
    Boon M; Van Baalen S
    Eur J Philos Sci; 2019; 9(1):16. PubMed ID: 30873248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to Assess the Epistemic Wrongness of Sponsorship Bias? The Case of Manufactured Certainty.
    Leefmann J
    Front Res Metr Anal; 2021; 6():599909. PubMed ID: 34027299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shared reality in intergroup communication: Increasing the epistemic authority of an out-group audience.
    Echterhoff G; Kopietz R; Higgins ET
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jun; 146(6):806-825. PubMed ID: 28368197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The IKEA effect and the production of epistemic goods.
    Tiehen J
    Philos Stud; 2022; 179(11):3401-3420. PubMed ID: 35791322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mapping epistemic cultures and learning potential of participants in citizen science projects.
    Vallabh P; Lotz-Sisitka H; O'Donoghue R; Schudel I
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):540-9. PubMed ID: 27110848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Philosophical import of non-epistemic values in clinical trials and data interpretation.
    Varghese J
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2019 Mar; 41(2):14. PubMed ID: 30900061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development and psychometric evaluation of the Questionnaire Epistemic Trust (QET): A self-report assessment of epistemic trust.
    Knapen S; Swildens WE; Mensink W; Hoogendoorn A; Hutsebaut J; Beekman ATF
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37947067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.