These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36032859)

  • 1. Comparative Study of Outcome of Type 1 Tympanoplasty in Dry and Wet Ear in Tertiary Care Hospital.
    Dhanajkar PS; Keche PN; Ambulgekar VK; Gawarle SH; Gundale AR
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Aug; 74(Suppl 1):217-223. PubMed ID: 36032859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of Type I Tympanoplasty in Wet and Dry Ear in Safe Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media.
    Deosthale NV; Khadakkar SP; Kumar PD; Harkare VV; Dhoke P; Dhote K; Banerjee M; Dagar V; Varma R
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Sep; 70(3):325-330. PubMed ID: 30211083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of outcome of type I tympanoplasty in dry and wet ear.
    Nagle SK; Jagade MV; Gandhi SR; Pawar PV
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jun; 61(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 23120622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is It Wise to Wait for Ear to Become Dry in Indian Scenario?
    Tiwari R; Singhal P; Verma N; Sehra R; Yadav R; Agarwal S; Prasad B
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Dec; 72(4):448-452. PubMed ID: 33088773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparitive Study on Impact of Dry (Rigid) Versus Wet (Soft) Graft on the Outcome of Type 1 Tympanoplasty.
    Shrikrishna BH; Poornima Ramesh M
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Aug; 74(Suppl 1):16-20. PubMed ID: 36032912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tympanoplasty: does dry or wet temporalis fascia graft matter?
    Singh GB; Kumar D; Aggarwal K; Garg S; Arora R; Kumar S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Aug; 130(8):700-5. PubMed ID: 27459498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of Outcomes of Tympanoplasty Between Wet and Dry Ears in Mucosal Type of COM.
    Sesodia N; Bhargava P; Agrawal A; Vaidya S
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Aug; 74(Suppl 1):79-83. PubMed ID: 36032900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Observation of the short-term effect of tympanoplasty（type Ⅰ） in dry and wet ears with chronic otitis media].
    Li C; Wang B; Wang X; Zhang H; Li S; Liu H; Zhang W
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 35(7):617-620. PubMed ID: 34304491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Tympanoplasty Results in Dry and Wet Ears.
    Naderpour M; Shahidi N; Hemmatjoo T
    Iran J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 28(86):209-14. PubMed ID: 27429950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of Tympanoplasty Performed in Dry and Wet Ear Groups: A Comprehensive Comparative Study.
    Mandal MM; Panchal AJ; Kumar R; Kapadia PB
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Dec; 74(Suppl 3):4164-4170. PubMed ID: 36742697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Surgical Outcome Using Wet and Dry Temporalis Fascia Graft in Type I Tympanoplasty.
    Sharma S; Rawat DS; Aseri Y; Trivedi GP; Verma PC; Singh BK
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Aug; 74(Suppl 1):229-233. PubMed ID: 36032894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy for active otitis media].
    Huang J; Yang L; Wang JY; Wang WQ
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 31(16):1284-1287. PubMed ID: 29798380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation and comparison of type I tympanoplasty efficacy and histopathological changes to the tympanic membrane in dry and wet ear: a prospective study.
    Shankar R; Virk RS; Gupta K; Gupta AK; Bal A; Bansal S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Oct; 129(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 26279256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wet Versus Dry Temporalis Fascia Graft in Type 1 Tympanoplasty: A Randomized Study on Controversy.
    Bansal M; Ojha T; Sharma P; Chhabra B; Sharma K; Trivedi B
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Dec; 74(Suppl 3):4467-4471. PubMed ID: 36742552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of Myringoplasty in Wet and Dry Ears in Mucosal Type of Chronic Otitis Media.
    Santosh UP; Prashanth KB; Rao MS
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Sep; 10(9):MC01-MC03. PubMed ID: 27790476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dry versus wet temporalis fascia graft in type-I tympanoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Albazee E; Abdelaziz A; Magzoub H; Alanzi A; Aldosari N; Al-Qudah M; Alomar K; Abu-Zaid A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Mar; 280(3):1005-1015. PubMed ID: 36350366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Study of Outcome of Type I Tympanoplasty in Chronic Otitis Media Active Mucosal Disease (Wet Ear) Versus Chronic Otitis Media Inactive Mucosal Disease (Dry Ear).
    Sharma Y; Mishra G; Patel JV
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Dec; 69(4):500-503. PubMed ID: 29238681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective and objective outcomes of tympanoplasty surgery at National Hospital Abuja, Nigeria 2005-2009.
    Olusesi AD; Opaluwah E; Hassan SB
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Mar; 268(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 20972573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of the use of dry (rigid) or wet (soft) temporal fascia graft on tympanoplasty.
    Alkan S; Baylanĉiĉek S; Sözen E; Baŝak T; Dadaŝ B
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Feb; 38(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 19344622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of the nature of the temporalis fascia graft on the outcome of type I underlay tympanoplasty.
    Jiang Z; Lou Z
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Jun; 131(6):472-475. PubMed ID: 28318475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.