BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36033228)

  • 1. Machine learning models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Bansal A; Garg C; Hariri E; Kassis N; Mentias A; Krishnaswamy A; Kapadia SR
    Cardiovasc Diagn Ther; 2022 Aug; 12(4):464-474. PubMed ID: 36033228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Machine learning ensemble models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumor.
    Muhlestein WE; Akagi DS; McManus AR; Chambless LB
    J Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 131(2):507-516. PubMed ID: 30239321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting Readmission Charges Billed by Hospitals: Machine Learning Approach.
    Gopukumar D; Ghoshal A; Zhao H
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Aug; 10(8):e37578. PubMed ID: 35896038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Machine Learning Prediction Models for In-Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Hernandez-Suarez DF; Kim Y; Villablanca P; Gupta T; Wiley J; Nieves-Rodriguez BG; Rodriguez-Maldonado J; Feliu Maldonado R; da Luz Sant'Ana I; Sanina C; Cox-Alomar P; Ramakrishna H; Lopez-Candales A; O'Neill WW; Pinto DS; Latib A; Roche-Lima A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(14):1328-1338. PubMed ID: 31320027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In-hospital outcomes comparison of transfemoral vs transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in propensity-matched cohorts with severe aortic stenosis.
    Doshi R; Shah P; Meraj PM
    Clin Cardiol; 2018 Mar; 41(3):326-332. PubMed ID: 29573452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in end stage renal disease.
    Alkhalil A; Golbari S; Song D; Lamba H; Fares A; Alaiti A; Deo S; Attizzani GF; Ibrahim H; Ruiz CE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 92(4):757-765. PubMed ID: 29171682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of right ventricular function in patients with aortic stenosis after transfemoral aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Cao Y; Singh V; Wang A; Zhang L; He T; Su H; Wei R; Duan Y; Jiang K; Wu W; Huang Y; Elmariah S; Qi G; Su X; Zhang Y; Zhang M
    Ther Adv Chronic Dis; 2020; 11():2040622320933775. PubMed ID: 32670537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost and contribution margin of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.
    McCarthy FH; Savino DC; Brown CR; Bavaria JE; Kini V; Spragan DD; Dibble TR; Herrmann HC; Anwaruddin S; Giri J; Szeto WY; Groeneveld PW; Desai ND
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Dec; 154(6):1872-1880.e1. PubMed ID: 28712581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incremental cost and length of stay associated with postprocedure delirium in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement patients in the United States.
    Potter BJ; Thompson C; Green P; Clancy S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1132-1136. PubMed ID: 30549428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes and readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis: A propensity matched analysis.
    Dhoble A; Bhise V; Nevah MI; Balan P; Nguyen TC; Estrera AL; Smalling RW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 91(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 28846185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In-Hospital Outcomes with Transfemoral Versus Transapical Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.
    Elbadawi A; Naqvi SY; Saad M; Elgendy IY; Mahmoud AA; Zainal A; Megaly M; Almahmoud MF; Altaweel A; Kleiman N; Abbott JD
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 May; 21(5):604-609. PubMed ID: 31757744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed in the catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach) versus hybrid operating room (standard approach): outcomes and cost analysis.
    Babaliaros V; Devireddy C; Lerakis S; Leonardi R; Iturra SA; Mavromatis K; Leshnower BG; Guyton RA; Kanitkar M; Keegan P; Simone A; Stewart JP; Ghasemzadeh N; Block P; Thourani VH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):898-904. PubMed ID: 25086843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfemoral Versus Subclavian Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Yousef S; Brown JA; Kliner D; Serna-Gallegos D; Toma C; Sanon S; Mulukutla S; Wang Y; Thoma FW; Sultan I
    Innovations (Phila); 2022; 17(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 35243929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose approach matter? A meta-analysis of outcomes following transfemoral versus transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Guo R; Xie M; Yim WY; Wu W; Jiang W; Wang Y; Hu X
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Jul; 21(1):358. PubMed ID: 34320946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk-Adjusted Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Stachon P; Kaier K; Zirlik A; Bothe W; Heidt T; Zehender M; Bode C; von Zur Mühlen C
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Apr; 8(7):e011504. PubMed ID: 30897991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unilateral Access Is Safe and Facilitates Peripheral Bailout During Transfemoral-Approach Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Khubber S; Bazarbashi N; Mohananey D; Kadri A; Gad MM; Kaur M; Sammour YM; Lyden M; Ahuja KR; Verma B; Menon V; Mick SL; Reed GW; Puri R; Svensson L; Navia JL; Tuzcu EM; Krishnaswamy A; Kapadia SR
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Nov; 12(21):2210-2220. PubMed ID: 31699379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Muscle fat index is associated with frailty and length of hospital stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients.
    Heidari B; Ahmad A; Al-Hijji MA; Aoun J; Singh M; Moynagh MR; Takahashi N; Lerman LO; Alkhouli MA; Lerman A
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 348():33-38. PubMed ID: 34871623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early post-approval experience with transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the USA.
    Burg JM; Fino NF; Tibayan FA; Rodriguez V; Raman J; Zahr F; Song HK
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2018 Aug; 59(4):619-625. PubMed ID: 29430888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcervical approach versus transfemoral approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Lu H; Monney P; Fournier S; Pavon AG; Roguelov C; Eeckhout E; Muller O; Kirsch M
    Int J Cardiol; 2021 Mar; 327():58-62. PubMed ID: 33242507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Risk.
    Baron SJ; Wang K; House JA; Magnuson EA; Reynolds MR; Makkar R; Herrmann HC; Kodali S; Thourani VH; Kapadia S; Svensson L; Mack MJ; Brown DL; Russo MJ; Smith CR; Webb J; Miller C; Leon MB; Cohen DJ
    Circulation; 2019 Feb; 139(7):877-888. PubMed ID: 30586747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.