These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36033967)

  • 1. MULTIPLY ROBUST ESTIMATORS OF CAUSAL EFFECTS FOR SURVIVAL OUTCOMES.
    Wen L; Hernán MA; Robins JM
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2022 Sep; 49(3):1304-1328. PubMed ID: 36033967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intervention treatment distributions that depend on the observed treatment process and model double robustness in causal survival analysis.
    Wen L; Marcus JL; Young JG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Mar; 32(3):509-523. PubMed ID: 36597699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A semiparametric multiply robust multiple imputation method for causal inference.
    Gochanour B; Chen S; Beebe L; Haziza D
    Metrika; 2023 Jul; 86(5):517-542. PubMed ID: 38736753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiply robust matching estimators of average and quantile treatment effects.
    Yang S; Zhang Y
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2023 Mar; 50(1):235-265. PubMed ID: 36844478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subclassification estimation of the weighted average treatment effect.
    Choi BY
    Biom J; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1706-1728. PubMed ID: 34270815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An improved multiply robust estimator for the average treatment effect.
    Wang C; Wei K; Huang C; Yu Y; Qin G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):231. PubMed ID: 37821829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ensemble and calibration multiply robust estimation for quantile treatment effect.
    He X; Wang L
    J Appl Stat; 2022; 49(15):3823-3845. PubMed ID: 36324477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.
    Xie Y; Cotton C; Zhu Y
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4238-4251. PubMed ID: 32857876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parametric g-formula implementations for causal survival analyses.
    Wen L; Young JG; Robins JM; Hernán MA
    Biometrics; 2021 Jun; 77(2):740-753. PubMed ID: 32588909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.
    Pang M; Schuster T; Filion KB; Schnitzer ME; Eberg M; Platt RW
    Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27889705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiply robust estimation of natural indirect effects with multiple ordered mediators.
    Tai AS; Lin SH
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):656-673. PubMed ID: 38081593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the marginal hazard ratio by simultaneously using a set of propensity score models: A multiply robust approach.
    Shu D; Han P; Wang R; Toh S
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(5):1224-1242. PubMed ID: 33410157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
    Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
    Hattori S; Henmi M
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonparametric inverse-probability-weighted estimators based on the highly adaptive lasso.
    Ertefaie A; Hejazi NS; van der Laan MJ
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1029-1041. PubMed ID: 35839293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doubly Robust Estimation in Observational Studies with Partial Interference.
    Liu L; Hudgens MG; Saul B; Clemens JD; Ali M; Emch ME
    Stat (Int Stat Inst); 2019; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 31440374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.