These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36036152)

  • 1. Robust Processing Advantage for Binomial Phrases with Variant Conjunctions.
    Chantavarin S; Morgan E; Ferreira F
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Sep; 46(9):e13187. PubMed ID: 36036152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is All Formulaic Language Created Equal? Unpacking the Processing Advantage for Different Types of Formulaic Sequences.
    Carrol G; Conklin K
    Lang Speech; 2020 Mar; 63(1):95-122. PubMed ID: 30693821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meaningfulness Beats Frequency in Multiword Chunk Processing.
    Jolsvai H; McCauley SM; Christiansen MH
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Oct; 44(10):e12885. PubMed ID: 32996628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seeing a phrase "time and again" matters: the role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences.
    Siyanova-Chanturia A; Conklin K; van Heuven WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 21355667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abstract knowledge versus direct experience in processing of binomial expressions.
    Morgan E; Levy R
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():384-402. PubMed ID: 27776281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scratching your tête over language-switched idioms: Evidence from eye-movement measures of reading.
    Senaldi MSG; Wei J; Gullifer JW; Titone D
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Aug; 50(6):1230-1256. PubMed ID: 35699909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adult age differences in the benefit of syntactic and semantic constraints for sentence processing.
    Beese C; Werkle-Bergner M; Lindenberger U; Friederici AD; Meyer L
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Feb; 34(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 30284854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual Differences in Reading Speed are Linked to Variability in the Processing of Lexical and Contextual Information: Evidence from Single-trial Event-related Brain Potentials.
    Payne B; Federmeier KD
    Word (N Y : 1945); 2019; 65(4):252-272. PubMed ID: 33692598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-Language Influences in the Processing of Multiword Expressions: From a First Language to Second and Back.
    Du L; Elgort I; Siyanova-Chanturia A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():666520. PubMed ID: 34248760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining the importance of frequency and contextual diversity in the lexical organization of multiword expressions.
    Senaldi MSG; Titone DA; Johns BT
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Jun; 76(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 35143239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Representation and processing of multi-word expressions in the brain.
    Siyanova-Chanturia A; Conklin K; Caffarra S; Kaan E; van Heuven WJB
    Brain Lang; 2017 Dec; 175():111-122. PubMed ID: 29078151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.
    Schmauder AR; Morris RK; Poynor DV
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1098-108. PubMed ID: 11126934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experimental eye-tracking study of text adaptation for readers with dyslexia: effects of visual support and word frequency.
    Rivero-Contreras M; Engelhardt PE; Saldaña D
    Ann Dyslexia; 2021 Apr; 71(1):170-187. PubMed ID: 33580863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How Do We Segment Text? Two-Stage Chunking Operation in Reading.
    Yang 杨金骉 J; Cai 蔡清 Q; Tian 田兴 X
    eNeuro; 2020; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 32393584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward Semantics in the Wild: Activation to Manipulable Nouns in Naturalistic Reading.
    Desai RH; Choi W; Lai VT; Henderson JM
    J Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 36(14):4050-5. PubMed ID: 27053211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limits on lexical prediction during reading.
    Luke SG; Christianson K
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Aug; 88():22-60. PubMed ID: 27376659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Words in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading.
    Schuster S; Hawelka S; Hutzler F; Kronbichler M; Richlan F
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3889-3904. PubMed ID: 27365297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sentential position of VN combination modulates the rhythmic pattern effect during Chinese sentence reading: Evidence from eye movements.
    Long J; Wang T; Yu M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Aug; 228():103641. PubMed ID: 35679737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of decay and lexical uncertainty on processing long-distance dependencies in reading.
    Stone K; von der Malsburg T; Vasishth S
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10438. PubMed ID: 33362963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.