228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36036610)
1. Effects on Mortality and Major Bleeding of Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 7 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trials.
Gargiulo G; Giacoppo D; Jolly SS; Cairns J; Le May M; Bernat I; Romagnoli E; Rao SV; van Leeuwen MAH; Mehta SR; Bertrand OF; Wells GA; Meijers TA; Siontis GCM; Esposito G; Windecker S; Jüni P; Valgimigli M;
Circulation; 2022 Nov; 146(18):1329-1343. PubMed ID: 36036610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.
Goel S; Pasam RT; Raheja H; Gotesman J; Gidwani U; Ahuja KR; Reed G; Puri R; Khatri JK; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):E201-E213. PubMed ID: 31430040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Piccolo R; Galasso G; Capuano E; De Luca S; Esposito G; Trimarco B; Piscione F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96127. PubMed ID: 24820096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
Porto I; Bolognese L; Dudek D; Goldstein P; Hamm C; Tanguay JF; Ten Berg J; Widimský P; Le Gall N; Zagar AJ; LeNarz LA; Miller D; Montalescot G;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bajaj A; Pancholy S; Sothwal A; Nawaz Y; Boruah P
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Sep; 20(9):790-798. PubMed ID: 30442537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom.
Ratib K; Mamas MA; Anderson SG; Bhatia G; Routledge H; De Belder M; Ludman PF; Fraser D; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):20-9. PubMed ID: 25616814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety of transradial access compared to transfemoral access with hemostatic devices (vessel plugs and suture devices) after percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chugh Y; Bavishi C; Mojadidi MK; Elgendy IY; Faillace RT; Brilakis ES; Tamis-Holland J; Mamas M; Chugh SK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 32521099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Sex on Comparative Outcomes of Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Invasive Management: Data From the Randomized MATRIX-Access Trial.
Gargiulo G; Ariotti S; Vranckx P; Leonardi S; Frigoli E; Ciociano N; Tumscitz C; Tomassini F; Calabrò P; Garducci S; Crimi G; Andò G; Ferrario M; Limbruno U; Cortese B; Sganzerla P; Lupi A; Russo F; Garbo R; Ausiello A; Zavalloni D; Sardella G; Esposito G; Santarelli A; Tresoldi S; Nazzaro MS; Zingarelli A; Petronio AS; Windecker S; da Costa BR; Valgimigli M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 29301646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Kolte D; Spence N; Puthawala M; Hyder O; Tuohy CP; Davidson CB; Sheldon MW; Laskey WK; Abbott JD
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):546-551. PubMed ID: 27566903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset.
Rashid M; Rushton CA; Kwok CS; Kinnaird T; Kontopantelis E; Olier I; Ludman P; De Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2258-2265. PubMed ID: 29169494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radial vs Femoral Access in ACS Patients Undergoing Complex PCI Is Associated With Consistent Bleeding Benefit and No Excess of Risks.
Landi A; Branca M; Vranckx P; Leonardi S; Frigoli E; Heg D; Calabro P; Esposito G; Sardella G; Tumscitz C; Garducci S; Andò G; Limbruno U; Sganzerla P; Santarelli A; Briguori C; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Pedrazzini G; Windecker S; Valgimigli M;
Can J Cardiol; 2022 Oct; 38(10):1488-1500. PubMed ID: 35753631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radial versus femoral access site for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction : A randomized prospective multicenter trial.
Schernthaner C; Hammerer M; Harb S; Heigert M; Hoellinger K; Lassnig E; Maurer E; Schuler J; Siostrzonek P; Ulmer H; Winter A; Altenberger J
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2018 Mar; 130(5-6):182-189. PubMed ID: 28900715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-Analysis on the Safety and Efficacy of Transradial Approach in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Nguyen DV; Nguyen QN; Pham HM; Le TX; Nguyen HTT
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Apr; 192():245-254. PubMed ID: 36710142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahsan MJ; Ahmad S; Latif A; Lateef N; Ahsan MZ; Abusnina W; Nathan S; Altin SE; Kolte DS; Messenger JC; Tannenbaum M; Goldsweig AM
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2022 Sep; 8(6):640-650. PubMed ID: 35460230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transulnar Versus Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Sedhom R; Megaly M; Abraham B; George JC; Kalra S; Janzer S
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2021 May; 26():39-45. PubMed ID: 33203582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between radial and femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized trials.
Ye Y; Zeng Y
Coron Artery Dis; 2019 Mar; 30(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 30531449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
