243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36036978)
1. Ecological Monitoring and Omics: A Comprehensive Comparison of Workflows for Mass Spectrometry-Based Quantitative Proteomics of Fish (
Nissa MU; Pinto N; Varshnay A; Goswami M; Srivastava S
OMICS; 2022 Sep; 26(9):489-503. PubMed ID: 36036978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of In-Solution, FASP, and S-Trap Based Digestion Methods for Bottom-Up Proteomic Studies.
Ludwig KR; Schroll MM; Hummon AB
J Proteome Res; 2018 Jul; 17(7):2480-2490. PubMed ID: 29754492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sample Preparation by Easy Extraction and Digestion (SPEED) - A Universal, Rapid, and Detergent-free Protocol for Proteomics Based on Acid Extraction.
Doellinger J; Schneider A; Hoeller M; Lasch P
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2020 Jan; 19(1):209-222. PubMed ID: 31754045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suspension Trapping (S-Trap) Is Compatible with Typical Protein Extraction Buffers and Detergents for Bottom-Up Proteomics.
Elinger D; Gabashvili A; Levin Y
J Proteome Res; 2019 Mar; 18(3):1441-1445. PubMed ID: 30761899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comprehensive comparison of sample preparation workflows for proteomics.
Zheng W; Yang P; Sun C; Zhang Y
Mol Omics; 2022 Jul; 18(6):555-567. PubMed ID: 35671090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of detergent-based sample preparation workflows for LTQ-Orbitrap analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome.
Tanca A; Biosa G; Pagnozzi D; Addis MF; Uzzau S
Proteomics; 2013 Sep; 13(17):2597-607. PubMed ID: 23784971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Organ-Based Proteome and Post-Translational Modification Profiling of a Widely Cultivated Tropical Water Fish,
Nissa MU; Pinto N; Mukherjee A; Reddy PJ; Ghosh B; Sun Z; Ghantasala S; Chetanya C; Shenoy SV; Moritz RL; Goswami M; Srivastava S
J Proteome Res; 2022 Feb; 21(2):420-437. PubMed ID: 34962809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The PeptideAtlas of a widely cultivated fish Labeo rohita: A resource for the Aquaculture Community.
Nissa MU; Reddy PJ; Pinto N; Sun Z; Ghosh B; Moritz RL; Goswami M; Srivastava S
Sci Data; 2022 Apr; 9(1):171. PubMed ID: 35418183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis.
Wiśniewski JR; Zougman A; Nagaraj N; Mann M
Nat Methods; 2009 May; 6(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 19377485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coupling suspension trapping-based sample preparation and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry for sensitive exosomal proteomic analysis.
Wu C; Zhou S; Mitchell MI; Hou C; Byers S; Loudig O; Ma J
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2022 Mar; 414(8):2585-2595. PubMed ID: 35181835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of protein and peptide fractionation approaches in protein identification and quantification from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Deng L; Handler DCL; Multari DH; Haynes PA
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2021 Jan; 1162():122453. PubMed ID: 33279813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of SPEED, S-Trap, and In-Solution-Based Sample Preparation Methods for Mass Spectrometry in Kidney Tissue and Plasma.
Templeton EM; Pilbrow AP; Kleffmann T; Pickering JW; Rademaker MT; Scott NJA; Ellmers LJ; Charles CJ; Endre ZH; Richards AM; Cameron VA; Lassé M
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Mar; 24(7):. PubMed ID: 37047281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proteomic analysis of liver tissue reveals Aeromonas hydrophila infection mediated modulation of host metabolic pathways in Labeo rohita.
Nissa MU; Pinto N; Ghosh B; Singh U; Goswami M; Srivastava S
J Proteomics; 2023 May; 279():104870. PubMed ID: 36906258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comprehensive data and workflow for mapping global proteome and post-translational modifications in Indian Major Carp,
Nissa MU; Banerjee A; Goswami M; Srivastava S
Data Brief; 2022 Dec; 45():108746. PubMed ID: 36533291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative assessment of in-solution digestion efficiency identifies optimal protocols for unbiased protein analysis.
León IR; Schwämmle V; Jensen ON; Sprenger RR
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Oct; 12(10):2992-3005. PubMed ID: 23792921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bottom-Up Proteomics: Advancements in Sample Preparation.
Duong VA; Lee H
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Mar; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 36982423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity of mass spectrometry analysis depends on the shape of the filtration unit used for filter aided sample preparation (FASP).
Lipecka J; Chhuon C; Bourderioux M; Bessard MA; van Endert P; Edelman A; Guerrera IC
Proteomics; 2016 Jul; 16(13):1852-7. PubMed ID: 27219663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Filter-Aided Sample Preparation for Proteome Analysis.
Wiśniewski JR
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1841():3-10. PubMed ID: 30259475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Label-Free Quantitative Analysis of Mitochondrial Proteomes Using the Multienzyme Digestion-Filter Aided Sample Preparation (MED-FASP) and "Total Protein Approach".
Wiśniewski JR
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1567():69-77. PubMed ID: 28276014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proteomic Profile of EPS-Urine through FASP Digestion and Data-Independent Analysis.
Prestagiacomo LE; Gabriele C; Morelli P; Rota MA; Alba S; Cuda G; Damiano R; Gaspari M
J Vis Exp; 2021 May; (171):. PubMed ID: 34028441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
