157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36037125)
1. The Optimal Cut-Off Point of the ADNEX Model for the Prediction of the Ovarian Cancer Risk.
Lam Huong L; Thi Phuong Dung N; Hoang Lam V; Tran Thao Nguyen N; Minh Tam L; Vu Quoc Huy N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Aug; 23(8):2713-2718. PubMed ID: 36037125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of models to diagnose ovarian cancer in patients managed surgically or conservatively: multicentre cohort study.
Van Calster B; Valentin L; Froyman W; Landolfo C; Ceusters J; Testa AC; Wynants L; Sladkevicius P; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Fruscio R; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kudla MJ; Chiappa V; Alcazar JL; Leone FPG; Buonomo F; Coccia ME; Guerriero S; Deo N; Jokubkiene L; Savelli L; Fischerová D; Czekierdowski A; Kaijser J; Coosemans A; Scambia G; Vergote I; Bourne T; Timmerman D
BMJ; 2020 Jul; 370():m2614. PubMed ID: 32732303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative Evaluation of the ADNEX Model for the Prediction of the Ovarian Cancer Risk of Adnexal Masses at Siriraj Hospital.
Poonyakanok V; Tanmahasamut P; Jaishuen A; Wongwananuruk T; Asumpinwong C; Panichyawat N; Chantrapanichkul P
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2021; 86(1-2):132-138. PubMed ID: 33596584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center.
Araujo KG; Jales RM; Pereira PN; Yoshida A; de Angelo Andrade L; Sarian LO; Derchain S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 27194129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the ADNEX and ROMA risk prediction models for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a multicentre external validation in patients who underwent surgery.
Landolfo C; Ceusters J; Valentin L; Froyman W; Van Gorp T; Heremans R; Baert T; Wouters R; Vankerckhoven A; Van Rompuy AS; Billen J; Moro F; Mascilini F; Neumann A; Van Holsbeke C; Chiappa V; Bourne T; Fischerova D; Testa A; Coosemans A; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
Br J Cancer; 2024 Apr; 130(6):934-940. PubMed ID: 38243011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions.
Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smolen A; Łoziński T; Guzik P; Kluz T
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36900029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of IOTA score and ADNEX model in the screening of ovarian malignancy in postmenopausal women.
Nohuz E; De Simone L; Chêne G
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 48(2):103-107. PubMed ID: 29709594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benign descriptors and ADNEX in two-step strategy to estimate risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors: retrospective validation in IOTA5 multicenter cohort.
Landolfo C; Bourne T; Froyman W; Van Calster B; Ceusters J; Testa AC; Wynants L; Sladkevicius P; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Fruscio R; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kudla MJ; Chiappa V; Alcazar JL; Leone FPG; Buonomo F; Coccia ME; Guerriero S; Deo N; Jokubkiene L; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Czekierdowski A; Kaijser J; Coosemans A; Scambia G; Vergote I; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 61(2):231-242. PubMed ID: 36178788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of CA125/CEA ratio and ultrasound parameters in identifying metastases to the ovaries in patients with multilocular and multilocular-solid ovarian masses.
Moro F; Pasciuto T; Djokovic D; Di Legge A; Granato V; Moruzzi MC; Mancari R; Zannoni GF; Fischerova D; Franchi D; Scambia G; Testa AC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 53(1):116-123. PubMed ID: 29978587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective assessment and IOTA ADNEX model in evaluation of adnexal masses in patients with history of breast cancer.
Pozzati F; Sassu CM; Marini G; Mascilini F; Biscione A; Giannarelli D; Garganese G; Fragomeni SM; Scambia G; Testa AC; Moro F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 37204769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Before surgery predictability of malignant ovarian tumors based on ADNEX model and its use in clinical practice].
Joyeux E; Miras T; Masquin I; Duglet PE; Astruc K; Douvier S
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 Oct; 44(10):557-564. PubMed ID: 27568408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of the Ultrasound ADNEX Model for Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors.
Peng XS; Ma Y; Wang LL; Li HX; Zheng XL; Liu Y
Int J Gen Med; 2021; 14():5665-5673. PubMed ID: 34557021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic Assessment of Complex Ultrasound Morphology Adnexal Tumors in Pregnant Women with the Use of IOTA Simple Rules Risk and ADNEX Scoring Systems.
Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smoleń A; Kluz T; Łoziński T; Miturski A; Kraczkowski J
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Feb; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33671023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective comparative trial comparing O-RADS, IOTA ADNEX model, and RMI score for preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses for prediction of ovarian cancer.
Poonyakanok V; Tanmahasamut P; Jaishuen A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 May; 49(5):1412-1417. PubMed ID: 36895122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions.
Chen GY; Hsu TF; Chan IS; Liu CH; Chao WT; Shih YC; Jiang LY; Chang YH; Wang PH; Chen YJ
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7854-7864. PubMed ID: 35583711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
