These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36037457)

  • 1. Biomechanical Analysis of Body Movements of Myoelectric Prosthesis Users During Standardized Clinical Tests.
    Vujaklija I; Jung MK; Hasenoehrl T; Roche AD; Sturma A; Muceli S; Crevenna R; Aszmann OC; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Mar; 70(3):789-799. PubMed ID: 36037457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Categorization of compensatory motions in transradial myoelectric prosthesis users.
    Hussaini A; Zinck A; Kyberd P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):286-293. PubMed ID: 27473642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Myoelectric prosthesis users and non-disabled individuals wearing a simulated prosthesis exhibit similar compensatory movement strategies.
    Williams HE; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Vette AH; Hebert JS
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 33933105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of the refined clothespin relocation test: A pilot study.
    Hussaini A; Hill W; Kyberd P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Oct; 43(5):485-491. PubMed ID: 31264508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of range-of-motion and variability in upper body movements between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks.
    Major MJ; Stine RL; Heckathorne CW; Fatone S; Gard SA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 11():132. PubMed ID: 25192744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of compensatory movements between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users during activities of daily living.
    Engdahl SM; Lee C; Gates DH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Jul; 97():105713. PubMed ID: 35809535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Refined clothespin relocation test and assessment of motion.
    Hussaini A; Kyberd P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 27473641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function.
    Hebert JS; Lewicke J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(8):1163-74. PubMed ID: 23341309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous Control of 2DOF Upper-Limb Prosthesis With Body Compensations-Based Control: A Multiple Cases Study.
    Legrand M; Marchand C; Richer F; Touillet A; Martinet N; Paysant J; Morel G; Jarrasse N
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():1745-1754. PubMed ID: 35749322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multifaceted suite of metrics for comparative myoelectric prosthesis controller research.
    Williams HE; Shehata AW; Cheng KY; Hebert JS; Pilarski PM
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0291279. PubMed ID: 38739557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hand Function Kinematics when using a Simulated Myoelectric Prosthesis.
    Williams HE; Boser QA; Pilarski PM; Chapman CS; Vette AH; Hebert JS
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():169-174. PubMed ID: 31374625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Training prosthesis users to switch between modes of a multi-articulating prosthetic hand.
    Heerschop A; van der Sluis CK; Bongers RM
    Disabil Rehabil; 2024 Jan; 46(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 36541182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compensatory strategies of body-powered prosthesis users reveal primary reliance on trunk motion and relation to skill level.
    Valevicius AM; Boser QA; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Vette AH; Hebert JS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Feb; 72():122-129. PubMed ID: 31862606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical analysis of users of multi-articulating externally powered prostheses with and without their device.
    Wanamaker AB; Whelan LR; Farley J; Chaudhari AM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Dec; 43(6):618-628. PubMed ID: 31466507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kinematic analysis of motor learning in upper limb body-powered bypass prosthesis training.
    Bloomer C; Wang S; Kontson K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226563. PubMed ID: 31978051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative Eye Gaze and Movement Differences in Visuomotor Adaptations to Varying Task Demands Among Upper-Extremity Prosthesis Users.
    Hebert JS; Boser QA; Valevicius AM; Tanikawa H; Lavoie EB; Vette AH; Pilarski PM; Chapman CS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911197. PubMed ID: 31517965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Motion Analysis Systems in Tracking Upper Body Movement of Myoelectric Bypass Prosthesis Users.
    Wang SL; Civillico G; Niswander W; Kontson KL
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 35458943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Actual prosthetic usage in relation to functional outcomes and wearing time in individuals with below-elbow amputation.
    Salminger S; Gstoettner C; Sturma A; Mayer JA; Papst H; Aszmann OC
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Oct; 46(5):408-413. PubMed ID: 35511449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms.
    Kuiken TA; Li G; Lock BA; Lipschutz RD; Miller LA; Stubblefield KA; Englehart KB
    JAMA; 2009 Feb; 301(6):619-28. PubMed ID: 19211469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The multi-grip and standard myoelectric hand prosthesis compared: does the multi-grip hand live up to its promise?
    Kerver N; Schuurmans V; van der Sluis CK; Bongers RM
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Feb; 20(1):22. PubMed ID: 36793049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.