207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36038075)
1. The preventive effect of glass ionomer restorations on new caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ge KX; Quock R; Chu CH; Yu OY
J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104272. PubMed ID: 36038075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The preventive effect of glass ionomer cement restorations on secondary caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ge KX; Quock R; Chu CH; Yu OY
Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):e1-e17. PubMed ID: 37838608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement or composite resin for restorations in posterior permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analyses.
Cribari L; Madeira L; Roeder RBR; Macedo RM; Wambier LM; Porto TS; Gonzaga CC; Kaizer MR
J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104629. PubMed ID: 37499738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical efficacy of bioactive restorative materials in controlling secondary caries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Pinto NS; Jorge GR; Vasconcelos J; Probst LF; De-Carli AD; Freire A
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):394. PubMed ID: 37322456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.
Dorri M; Martinez-Zapata MJ; Walsh T; Marinho VC; Sheiham Deceased A; Zaror C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD008072. PubMed ID: 29284075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement (GIC) and resin-modified GIC restorations: a systematic review.
Mickenautsch S; Tyas MJ; Yengopal V; Oliveira LB; Bönecker M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Sep; 18(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 21077424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic review and network meta-analysis of restorative therapy and adhesive strategies in root caries lesions.
Schmidt J; Proesl S; Schulz-Kornas E; Haak R; Meyer-Lueckel H; Campus G; Esteves-Oliveira M
J Dent; 2024 Mar; 142():104776. PubMed ID: 37977410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival of Adhesive Restorations for Primary Molars: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Clinical Trials.
Santos AP; Moreira IK; Scarpelli AC; Pordeus IA; Paiva SM; Martins CC
Pediatr Dent; 2016 Oct; 38(5):370-378. PubMed ID: 28206891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of ART and conventional techniques on clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement restorations in load bearing areas of permanent and primary dentitions: A systematic review.
Ruengrungsom C; Palamara JEA; Burrow MF
J Dent; 2018 Nov; 78():1-21. PubMed ID: 30017937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical performance of laminate and non-laminate resin composite restorations: a systematic review.
Nguyen KV; Sathorn C; Wong RH; Burrow MF
Aust Dent J; 2015 Dec; 60(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 25404178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating Glass Ionomer Cement Longevity in the Primary and Permanent Teeth-An Umbrella Review.
Panetta A; Lopes P; Novaes TF; Rio R; Fernandes GVO; Mello-Moura ACV
J Funct Biomater; 2024 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 38391901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations in Cervical Lesions More Long-Lasting than Resin-based Composite Resins? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Boing TF; de Geus JL; Wambier LM; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Gomes OMM
J Adhes Dent; 2018; 20(5):435-452. PubMed ID: 30349908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glass ionomer or composite resin for primary molars.
Jones G; Taylor G
Evid Based Dent; 2018 Oct; 19(3):86-87. PubMed ID: 30361668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of head and neck radiotherapy on the longevity of dental adhesive restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Palmier NR; Madrid Troconis CC; Normando AGC; Guerra ENS; Araújo ALD; Arboleda LPA; Fonsêca JM; de Pauli Paglioni M; Gomes-Silva W; Vechiato Filho AJ; González-Arriagada WA; Paes Leme AF; Prado-Ribeiro AC; Brandão TB; de Goes MF; Lopes MA; Santos-Silva AR
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):886-896. PubMed ID: 33715834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters.
Heintze SD; Loguercio AD; Hanzen TA; Reis A; Rousson V
Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):e109-e135. PubMed ID: 35221127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
