These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36038724)

  • 1. Detection ability of corneal biomechanical parameters for early diagnosis of ectasia.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Heravian J; Ansari A; Shayanfar H; Moshirfar M
    Eye (Lond); 2023 Jun; 37(8):1665-1672. PubMed ID: 36038724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Indices in Distinguishing Between Normal, Very Asymmetric, and Bilateral Keratoconic Eyes.
    Herber R; Hasanli A; Lenk J; Vinciguerra R; Terai N; Pillunat LE; Raiskup F
    J Refract Surg; 2022 Jun; 38(6):364-372. PubMed ID: 35686712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
    Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of Scheimpflug-derived corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices for detecting subclinical and mild keratectasia in a South Asian population.
    Kataria P; Padmanabhan P; Gopalakrishnan A; Padmanaban V; Mahadik S; Ambrósio R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Mar; 45(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 30527442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of Subclinical Corneal Ectasia Using Corneal Tomographic and Biomechanical Assessments in a Japanese Population.
    Koh S; Ambrósio R; Inoue R; Maeda N; Miki A; Nishida K
    J Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 35(6):383-390. PubMed ID: 31185104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Ectasia Detection in Early Keratoconus Using Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments.
    Wallace HB; Vellara HR; Gokul A; McGhee CNJ; Meyer JJ
    Cornea; 2023 Dec; 42(12):1528-1535. PubMed ID: 36973879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection.
    Ambrósio R; Lopes BT; Faria-Correia F; Salomão MQ; Bühren J; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Jul; 33(7):434-443. PubMed ID: 28681902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal corneas.
    Guo LL; Tian L; Cao K; Li YX; Li N; Yang WQ; Jie Y
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 36(8):671-678. PubMed ID: 33734947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimized Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Ectasia Detection Using Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Data.
    Ambrósio R; Machado AP; Leão E; Lyra JMG; Salomão MQ; Esporcatte LGP; da Fonseca Filho JBR; Ferreira-Meneses E; Sena NB; Haddad JS; Costa Neto A; de Almeida GC; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P; Bühren J; Kohnen T; Kezirian GM; Hafezi F; Hafezi NL; Torres-Netto EA; Lu N; Kang DSY; Kermani O; Koh S; Padmanabhan P; Taneri S; Trattler W; Gualdi L; Salgado-Borges J; Faria-Correia F; Flockerzi E; Seitz B; Jhanji V; Chan TCY; Baptista PM; Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Rocha KM; Waring GO; Krueger RR; Dupps WJ; Khoramnia R; Hashemi H; Asgari S; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Zarei-Ghanavati S; Shetty R; Khamar P; Belin MW; Lopes BT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2023 Jul; 251():126-142. PubMed ID: 36549584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Corneal Tomography and a New Combined Tomographic Biomechanical Index in Subclinical Keratoconus.
    Chan TCY; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Sep; 34(9):616-621. PubMed ID: 30199566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia and Corvis ST parameters for subclinical keratoconus.
    Song Y; Feng Y; Qu M; Ma Q; Tian H; Li D; He R
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 43(5):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 36255612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients.
    Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):339. PubMed ID: 34544392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corneal biomechanical parameters in keratoconus eyes with abnormal elevation on the back corneal surface only versus both back and front surfaces.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Roberts CJ; Maddah N; Ambrósio R; Hosseini SR
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):11971. PubMed ID: 34099765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in healthy thin corneas with matched keratoconus eyes.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ehsaei A; Vinciguerra R; Zamani O; Robabi H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Mar; 49(3):234-238. PubMed ID: 36449663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corneal biomechanics in normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes.
    Peyman A; Sepahvand F; Pourazizi M; Noorshargh P; Forouhari A
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):459. PubMed ID: 37968616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical Analysis of Tomographically Regular Keratoconus Fellow Eyes Using Corvis ST.
    Augustin VA; Son HS; Kovalchuk B; Yildirim TM; Köppe MK; Auffarth GU; Khoramnia R
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2023 Aug; 240(8):944-951. PubMed ID: 37567232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Role of Corneal Biomechanics for the Evaluation of Ectasia Patients.
    Salomão MQ; Hofling-Lima AL; Gomes Esporcatte LP; Lopes B; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P; Bühren J; Sena N; Luz Hilgert GS; Ambrósio R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32209975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of Corvis ST Parameters Including Updated Stress-Strain Index in Differentiating Between Normal, Forme-Fruste, Subclinical, and Clinical Keratoconic Eyes.
    Miao YY; Ma XM; Qu ZX; Eliasy A; Wu BW; Xu H; Wang P; Zheng XB; Wang JJ; Ye YF; Chen SH; Elsheikh A; Bao FJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 258():196-207. PubMed ID: 37879454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Influence factors and differences of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam system combined with Corvis ST].
    Peng YS; Chen M; Tian L; Li H; Li DW; Zhang FF
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 56(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 32074821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.