These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36038724)

  • 21. Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Varying Severities of Myopia.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Azimi A; Fakhimi Z; Ziaei M; Danesh Z; Roberts CJ; Monfared N; Jamali A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2020; 8():595330. PubMed ID: 33553113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Yekta AA; Danesh Z; Reisdorf S; Khabazkhoob M; Heidari HR; Sadeghi J
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):849-856. PubMed ID: 30540368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy and keratoconic eyes using dynamic bidirectional applanation device and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.
    Herber R; Ramm L; Spoerl E; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Terai N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 45(6):778-788. PubMed ID: 30902432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical behavior in vivo for healthy and keratoconic eyes using the stress-strain index.
    Padmanabhan P; Lopes BT; Eliasy A; Abass A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R; Elsheikh A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 35333824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Corneal ectasia detection by epithelial pattern standard deviation from OCT.
    Salomão MQ; Hofling-Lima AL; Gomes Esporcatte LP; Correa FF; Meneses EF; Li Y; Huang D; Lopes B; Sena N; Machado AP; Ambrósio R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Feb; 49(2):190-194. PubMed ID: 36201664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes.
    Tian L; Wang D; Wu Y; Meng X; Chen B; Ge M; Huang Y
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Nishida T; Kojima T; Kataoka T; Isogai N; Yoshida Y; Nakamura T
    Ophthalmic Res; 2020; 63(6):541-549. PubMed ID: 32106114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative analysis of the morphological and biomechanical properties of normal cornea and keratoconus at different stages.
    Wu Y; Guo LL; Tian L; Xu ZQ; Li Q; Hu J; Huang YF; Wang LQ
    Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 41(11):3699-3711. PubMed ID: 34232432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Early Diagnosis of Keratoconus in Chinese Myopic Eyes by Combining Corvis ST with Pentacam.
    Zhang M; Zhang F; Li Y; Song Y; Wang Z
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):118-123. PubMed ID: 31466466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enhanced Tomographic Assessment to Detect Corneal Ectasia Based on Artificial Intelligence.
    Lopes BT; Ramos IC; Salomão MQ; Guerra FP; Schallhorn SC; Schallhorn JM; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P; Price FW; Price MO; Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Belin MW; Machado AP; Ambrósio R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 195():223-232. PubMed ID: 30098348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical Evaluation of Topographically and Tomographically Normal Fellow Eyes of Patients With Keratoconus.
    Asroui L; Dagher SA; Elsheikh A; Lopes BT; Roberts CJ; Assouad M; Awwad ST
    J Refract Surg; 2022 May; 38(5):318-325. PubMed ID: 35536713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical properties analysis of forme fruste keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus.
    Huo Y; Chen X; Cao H; Li J; Hou J; Wang Y
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1311-1320. PubMed ID: 36441226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of white-to-white corneal diameter on biomechanical indices assessed by Pentacam Scheimpflug corneal tomography and corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology.
    Lin Q; Shen Z
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 42(5):1537-1543. PubMed ID: 34988748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ORA waveform-derived biomechanical parameters to distinguish normal from keratoconic eyes.
    Luz A; Fontes BM; Lopes B; Ramos I; Schor P; Ambrósio R
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2013; 76(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 23828472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Fontes B; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 164():14-21. PubMed ID: 26743618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of Corneal Pachymetry Distribution and Morphologic Changes in Subclinical Keratoconus with Normal Biomechanics.
    Song P; Yang K; Li P; Liu Y; Liang D; Ren S; Zeng Q
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():1748579. PubMed ID: 31828090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Enhanced Combined Tomography and Biomechanics Data for Distinguishing Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Ramos I; Faria-Correia F; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Jul; 32(7):479-94. PubMed ID: 27400080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tomographic and Biomechanical Scheimpflug Imaging for Keratoconus Characterization: A Validation of Current Indices.
    Steinberg J; Siebert M; Katz T; Frings A; Mehlan J; Druchkiv V; Bühren J; Linke SJ
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):840-847. PubMed ID: 30540367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
    Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.
    Chan TC; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 28559422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.