These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36038813)

  • 1. A comparison of multiple imputation strategies to deal with missing nonnormal data in structural equation modeling.
    Jia F; Wu W
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):3100-3119. PubMed ID: 36038813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum likelihood versus multiple imputation for missing data in small longitudinal samples with nonnormality.
    Shin T; Davison ML; Long JD
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):426-449. PubMed ID: 27709974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating methods for handling missing ordinal data in structural equation modeling.
    Jia F; Wu W
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):2337-2355. PubMed ID: 30684226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple imputation by predictive mean matching in cluster-randomized trials.
    Bailey BE; Andridge R; Shoben AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):72. PubMed ID: 32228491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pooling test statistics across multiply imputed datasets for nonnormal items.
    Jia F
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1229-1243. PubMed ID: 36973636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abstract: Evaluation of Test Statistics for Robust Structural Equation Modeling With Nonnormal Missing Data.
    Tong X; Zhang Z; Yuan KH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2011 Nov; 46(6):1016. PubMed ID: 26736130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of full information maximum likelihood and multiple imputation in structural equation modeling with missing data.
    Lee T; Shi D
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):466-485. PubMed ID: 33507765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation study.
    Marshall A; Altman DG; Royston P; Holder RL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jan; 10():7. PubMed ID: 20085642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of random-forest-based imputation of missing data in the presence of non-normality, non-linearity, and interaction.
    Hong S; Lynn HS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):199. PubMed ID: 32711455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Methods for Creating Multiple Imputations of Nominal Variables.
    Lang KM; Wu W
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):290-304. PubMed ID: 28266876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining Nonnormal Latent Variable Distributions for Non-Ignorable Missing Data.
    Liu CW
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 May; 45(3):159-177. PubMed ID: 33958834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the Performances of Missing Data Handling Methods in Ability Estimation From Sparse Data.
    Xiao J; Bulut O
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Oct; 80(5):932-954. PubMed ID: 32855565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple imputation strategies for a bounded outcome variable in a competing risks analysis.
    Curnow E; Hughes RA; Birnie K; Crowther MJ; May MT; Tilling K
    Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(8):1917-1929. PubMed ID: 33469974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias and Precision of the "Multiple Imputation, Then Deletion" Method for Dealing With Missing Outcome Data.
    Sullivan TR; Salter AB; Ryan P; Lee KJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 182(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 26337075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple imputation strategies for zero-inflated cost data in economic evaluations: which method works best?
    MacNeil Vroomen J; Eekhout I; Dijkgraaf MG; van Hout H; de Rooij SE; Heymans MW; Bosmans JE
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Nov; 17(8):939-950. PubMed ID: 26497027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple imputation strategies for missing event times in a multi-state model analysis.
    Curnow E; Hughes RA; Birnie K; Tilling K; Crowther MJ
    Stat Med; 2024 Mar; 43(6):1238-1255. PubMed ID: 38258282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of multiple imputation strategies for handling missing data in multi-item scales: Guidance for longitudinal studies.
    Mainzer R; Apajee J; Nguyen CD; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(21):4660-4674. PubMed ID: 34102709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normal Theory Two-Stage ML Estimator When Data Are Missing at the Item Level.
    Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    J Educ Behav Stat; 2017 Aug; 42(4):405-431. PubMed ID: 29276371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.