232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36038846)
1. Interrater reliability estimators tested against true interrater reliabilities.
Zhao X; Feng GC; Ao SH; Liu PL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):232. PubMed ID: 36038846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples.
Wongpakaran N; Wongpakaran T; Wedding D; Gwet KL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Apr; 13():61. PubMed ID: 23627889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Evaluation of Interrater Reliability Measures on Binary Tasks Using
Grant MJ; Button CM; Snook B
Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jun; 41(4):264-276. PubMed ID: 29881092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new coefficient of interrater agreement: The challenge of highly unequal category proportions.
van Oest R
Psychol Methods; 2019 Aug; 24(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 29723005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Flexor Pollicis Longus Reflex: Interrater and Intrarater Reliability in Comparison With Established Muscle Stretch Reflexes.
Gladitz LM; Schöttker-Königer T; Sturm C; Gutenbrunner C; Ranker A
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Jun; 100(6):539-545. PubMed ID: 33998607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of raters threshold in estimating interrater agreement.
Nucci M; Spoto A; Altoè G; Pastore M
Psychol Methods; 2021 Oct; 26(5):622-634. PubMed ID: 34855432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interrater agreement statistics with skewed data: evaluation of alternatives to Cohen's kappa.
Xu S; Lorber MF
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2014 Dec; 82(6):1219-27. PubMed ID: 25090041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gwet's AC1 is not a substitute for Cohen's kappa - A comparison of basic properties.
Vach W; Gerke O
MethodsX; 2023; 10():102212. PubMed ID: 37234937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Better to be in agreement than in bad company : A critical analysis of many kappa-like tests.
Silveira PSP; Siqueira JO
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3326-3347. PubMed ID: 36114386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interrater reliability of the categorization of late radiographic changes after lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Faruqi S; Giuliani ME; Raziee H; Yap ML; Roberts H; Le LW; Brade A; Cho J; Sun A; Bezjak A; Hope AJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Aug; 89(5):1076-1083. PubMed ID: 25035211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability in evaluator-based tests: using simulation-constructed models to determine contextually relevant agreement thresholds.
Beckler DT; Thumser ZC; Schofield JS; Marasco PD
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):141. PubMed ID: 30453897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.
McHugh ML
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2012; 22(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 23092060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of true within-herd prevalence of small ruminant lentivirus infection in goats on agreement between serological immunoenzymatic tests.
Czopowicz M; Szaluś-Jordanow O; Mickiewicz M; Moroz A; Witkowski L; Markowska-Daniel I; Bagnicka E; Kaba J
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Sep; 144():75-80. PubMed ID: 28716207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of exposure assessors' ratings of exposure intensity by type of occupational questionnaire and type of rater.
Friesen MC; Coble JB; Katki HA; Ji BT; Xue S; Lu W; Stewart PA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):601-11. PubMed ID: 21511891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Degenerative findings in lumbar spine MRI: an inter-rater reliability study involving three raters.
Doktor K; Jensen TS; Christensen HW; Fredberg U; Kindt M; Boyle E; Hartvigsen J
Chiropr Man Therap; 2020 Feb; 28(1):8. PubMed ID: 32041626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: key concepts, approaches, and applications.
Gisev N; Bell JS; Chen TF
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2013; 9(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 22695215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The interrater reliability and agreement of a 0 to 10 uterine tone score in cesarean delivery.
Cole NM; Abushoshah I; Fields KG; Carusi DA; Robinson JN; Bateman BT; Farber MK
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 May; 3(3):100342. PubMed ID: 33652161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver agreement: Cohen's kappa coefficient does not necessarily reflect the percentage of patients with congruent classifications.
Steinijans VW; Diletti E; Bömches B; Greis C; Solleder P
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1997 Mar; 35(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 9088995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Weighting schemes and incomplete data: A generalized Bayesian framework for chance-corrected interrater agreement.
van Oest R; Girard JM
Psychol Methods; 2022 Dec; 27(6):1069-1088. PubMed ID: 34766799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Homogeneity score test of AC
Honda C; Ohyama T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 32020851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
