These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36039634)
1. Effect of different soil water managements on the selectivity of fomesafen in conventional and RR soybean. Gonçalves CG; Marques RF; de Marchi SR; Martins D J Environ Sci Health B; 2022; 57(10):786-795. PubMed ID: 36039634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the ahas transgene and of herbicides associated with the soybean crop on soil microbial communities. Souza RA; Babujia LC; Silva AP; de Fátima Guimarães M; Arias CA; Hungria M Transgenic Res; 2013 Oct; 22(5):877-92. PubMed ID: 23420042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of fomesafen on the soil microbial communities in soybean fields in Northeastern China. Wu XH; Zhang Y; Du PQ; Xu J; Dong FS; Liu XG; Zheng YQ Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Feb; 148():169-176. PubMed ID: 29054028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of the ahas transgene for herbicides resistance on biological nitrogen fixation and yield of soybean. Hungria M; Nakatani AS; Souza RA; Sei FB; de Oliveira Chueire LM; Arias CA Transgenic Res; 2015 Feb; 24(1):155-65. PubMed ID: 25201300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phytotoxicity response of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seedlings to herbicide fomesafen in soil. Li X; Riaz M; Song B; Liu H Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Jul; 239():113628. PubMed ID: 35576801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conventional (MG-BR46 Conquista) and transgenic (BRS Valiosa RR) soybeans have no mutagenic effects and may protect against induced-DNA damage in vivo. Venâncio VP; Silva JP; Almeida AA; Brigagão MR; Azevedo L Nutr Cancer; 2012; 64(5):725-31. PubMed ID: 22662908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of a G2-EPSPS & GAT Dual Transgenic Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Line on the Soil Microbial Community under Field Conditions Affected by Glyphosate Application. Yang M; Wen Z; Fazal A; Hua X; Xu X; Yin T; Qi J; Yang R; Lu G; Hong Z; Yang Y Microbes Environ; 2020; 35(4):. PubMed ID: 33162465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Herbicide application timing in preharvest desiccation of soybean cultivars with different growth habits. Zagonel J J Environ Sci Health B; 2005; 40(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 15656157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selectivity of metsulfuron applied to soybean before sowing in different intervals and soils. Silva JDGD; Müller C; Galon L; Pawelkiewicz R; Menegat AD; Brandler D; Toso JO; Perin GF J Environ Sci Health B; 2021; 56(7):623-633. PubMed ID: 34029160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of glyphosate in Johnsongrass submitted to different soil water potentials. Silva AC; Marques RF; Gonçalves CG; Pereira MRR; Martins D J Environ Sci Health B; 2023; 58(4):285-293. PubMed ID: 36772954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exposure to fomesafen alters the gut microbiota and the physiology of the earthworm Pheretima guillelmi. Chang X; Sun Y; Zhao L; Li X; Yang S; Weng L; Li Y Chemosphere; 2021 Dec; 284():131290. PubMed ID: 34198065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fomesafen impacts bacterial communities and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere. Hu H; Zhou H; Zhou S; Li Z; Wei C; Yu Y; Hay AG Environ Pollut; 2019 Oct; 253():302-311. PubMed ID: 31323613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Esterase polymorphisms for analysis of genetic diversity and structure of soybean (Glycine max) cultivars. Valentini LC; Mangolin CA; Collet SA; Machado MF Genet Mol Res; 2011 Oct; 10(4):2472-81. PubMed ID: 22009859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Soil-applied biochar increases microbial diversity and wheat plant performance under herbicide fomesafen stress. Meng L; Sun T; Li M; Saleem M; Zhang Q; Wang C Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Apr; 171():75-83. PubMed ID: 30597319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of an immunoassay based on a specific antibody for the detection of diphenyl ether herbicide fomesafen. Gao Q; Chen L; An Z; Wang Y; Yang D; Wang Z; Kang J; Barnych B; Hammock BD; Huo J; Zhang J Sci Total Environ; 2024 Mar; 914():169858. PubMed ID: 38190900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early Identification of Herbicide Stress in Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) Using Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Technology. Li H; Wang P; Weber JF; Gerhards R Sensors (Basel); 2017 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 29271905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resistance to PPO-inhibiting herbicide in Palmer amaranth from Arkansas. Salas RA; Burgos NR; Tranel PJ; Singh S; Glasgow L; Scott RC; Nichols RL Pest Manag Sci; 2016 May; 72(5):864-9. PubMed ID: 26817647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mobility and persistence of the herbicide fomesafen in soils cultivated with bean plants using SLE/LTP and HPLC/DAD. Costa AI; Queiroz ME; Neves AA; de Assis RC; dos Soares CE; da Silva AA; D'Antonino L; de Oliveira AF; Bellato CR Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Mar; 22(5):3457-66. PubMed ID: 25242590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Field and Laboratory Dissipation of the Herbicide Fomesafen in the Southern Atlantic Coastal Plain (USA). Potter TL; Bosch DD; Strickland TC J Agric Food Chem; 2016 Jun; 64(25):5156-63. PubMed ID: 27268304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Seed Damage by the Neotropical Brown Stink Bug, Euschistus heros (F.) to Resistant Soybean Cultivars with the Block Technology Versus a Susceptible Cultivar. Pastorio Oliveira W; Lucini T; Ricardo Panizzi A Environ Entomol; 2022 Apr; 51(2):451-459. PubMed ID: 35267015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]