These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36040808)

  • 1. Two-Year Interview and Match Outcomes of Otolaryngology Preference Signaling.
    Chang CWD; Thorne MC; Malekzadeh S; Pletcher SD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Mar; 168(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 36040808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience.
    Pletcher SD; Chang CWD; Thorne MC; Malekzadeh S
    Acad Med; 2022 May; 97(5):664-668. PubMed ID: 34618735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interview Invitations for Otolaryngology Residency Positions Across Demographic Groups Following Implementation of Preference Signaling.
    Pletcher SD; Chang CWD; Thorne MC; Malekzadeh S; Francis CL; Naemi B; Costa J; Dunleavy D
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e231922. PubMed ID: 36881409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Computer Simulation Model to Analyze the Application Process for Competitive Residency Programs.
    Whipple ME; Law AB; Bly RA
    J Grad Med Educ; 2019 Feb; 11(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 30805093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Preference Signaling on Residency Interview Distribution Among Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Applicants.
    Standiford TC; David Chang CW; Thorne MC; Malekzadeh S; Pletcher SD
    J Surg Educ; 2023 Feb; 80(2):170-176. PubMed ID: 36272913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applicant Perspectives on the Otolaryngology Residency Application Process.
    Ward M; Pingree C; Laury AM; Bowe SN
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Aug; 143(8):782-787. PubMed ID: 28542682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preference Signaling and the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match: A National Survey Study.
    Sergesketter AR; Song E; Shammas RL; Tian WM; Eberlin KR; Ko JH; Momoh AO; Snyder-Warwick A; Phillips BT
    J Surg Educ; 2024 May; 81(5):662-670. PubMed ID: 38553367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current Interview Trail Metrics in the Otolaryngology Match.
    Cabrera-Muffly C; Chang CWD; Puscas L
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Jun; 156(6):1097-1103. PubMed ID: 28168889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The golden tickets: impact of preference signaling on obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants.
    Cai F; Southworth E; Santiago S; Stephenson-Famy A; Fay E; Wang EY; Burns RN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Feb; 230(2):262.e1-262.e9. PubMed ID: 37839590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of the Standardized Interview Offer Date Initiatives: A Survey of Otolaryngology Applicants and Programs.
    Standiford TC; Thorne MC; Chang CWD; Malekzadeh S; Pletcher SD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Aug; 169(2):267-275. PubMed ID: 36871180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Applicants' Characteristics and Geographic Connections to Residency Programs on Preference Signaling Outcomes in the Match.
    Benjamin WJ; Lenze NR; Bohm LA; Thorne MC; Abraham R; Sepdham D; Mihalic AP; Kupfer RA
    Acad Med; 2024 Apr; 99(4):437-444. PubMed ID: 37976398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Applicant-to-Residency Program Communication: Does It Matter?
    Solis RN; Quesada PR; Ma C; Olinde LM; Diaz RC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Nov; 129(11):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 32483992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Qualities of residency applicants: comparison of otolaryngology program criteria with applicant expectations.
    Puscas L; Sharp SR; Schwab B; Lee WT
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jan; 138(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 22249622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peri-Interview Communication in the Otolaryngology Residency Match: The Applicant Perspective.
    Masciello M; Malekzadeh S
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jan; 131(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 32065402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving Applicant Satisfaction in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Matching: The Role of Preference Signaling.
    Tamburini LM; Davey AP; Messina JC; Zeng F; Geaney LE
    Iowa Orthop J; 2024; 44(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 38919355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of Applicant Signaling for Otolaryngology Interviews.
    Yousef A; Nichol A; Watson D
    Laryngoscope; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39007422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Competitiveness of Otolaryngology Residency Applicants without a Home Program.
    Wang JC; Pillutla P; Tello N; Gabrilska R; Aranke M; Bibb T; Watkins PD; Cordero J
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 May; 129(5):462-468. PubMed ID: 31845588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preference Signaling Pilot in the Urology Match: Outcomes and Perceptions.
    Traxel E; Richstone L; Brown J; Mirza M; Greene K; Thavaseelan S
    Urology; 2022 Dec; 170():27-32. PubMed ID: 36115432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the 2021 Otolaryngology Residency Match: Analysis of the Texas STAR Database.
    Lenze NR; Mihalic AP; Kovatch KJ; Thorne MC; Kupfer RA
    Laryngoscope; 2022 Jun; 132(6):1177-1183. PubMed ID: 34515992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Otolaryngology Residency Interviews in a Socially Distanced World: Strategies to Recruit and Assess Applicants.
    Chou DW; Pletcher SD; Bruss D; Sung CK; Diaz RC; Liang J; Durr ML
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 May; 164(5):903-908. PubMed ID: 32870721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.