168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36041289)
1. Assessing Australian consumer preferences for fresh pork meat attributes: A best-worst approach on 46 attributes.
Duong C; Sung B; Lee S; Easton J
Meat Sci; 2022 Nov; 193():108954. PubMed ID: 36041289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. USA millennial and non-millennial beef consumers perception of beef, pork, and chicken.
Laird HL; Miller RK; Kerth CR; Berto MC; Adhikari K
Meat Sci; 2024 Aug; 214():109516. PubMed ID: 38678864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consumers' segmentation based on the acceptability of meat from entire male pigs with different boar taint levels in four European countries: France, Italy, Spain and United Kingdom.
Panella-Riera N; Blanch M; Kallas Z; Chevillon P; Garavaldi A; Gil M; Gil JM; Font-I-Furnols M; Oliver MA
Meat Sci; 2016 Apr; 114():137-145. PubMed ID: 26773971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumers' view on pork: Consumption motives and production preferences in ten European Union and four non-European Union countries.
Lin-Schilstra L; Backus G; Snoek H; Mörlein D
Meat Sci; 2022 May; 187():108736. PubMed ID: 35123247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Credence cues of pork are more important than consumers' culinary skills to boost their purchasing intention.
Argemí-Armengol I; Villalba D; Ripoll G; Teixeira A; Álvarez-Rodríguez J
Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():11-21. PubMed ID: 30954794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Review: Pork quality attributes from farm to fork. Part I. Carcass and fresh meat.
Lebret B; Čandek-Potokar M
Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100402. PubMed ID: 34836808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consumer perception of entire male pork coated with spiced edible films as a new product to mask boar taint.
Garrido MD; Egea M; Font-I-Furnols M; Linares MB; Peñaranda I
Meat Sci; 2023 Jul; 201():109171. PubMed ID: 37003166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Review: Pork quality attributes from farm to fork. Part II. Processed pork products.
Lebret B; Čandek-Potokar M
Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100383. PubMed ID: 34750079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emerging market for pork with animal welfare attribute in China: An ethical perspective.
Liang Y; Xu Y; Lai D; Hua G; Huang D; Wang H; Li H; Han L
Meat Sci; 2023 Jan; 195():108994. PubMed ID: 36240585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for safe pork products in rural Kenya.
Gichuyia CM; Mtimet N; Fèvre EM; Thomas LF; Gathura PB; Onono JO; Akaichi F
Meat Sci; 2024 May; 211():109450. PubMed ID: 38350245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork.
Verbeke W; Pérez-Cueto FJ; Barcellos MD; Krystallis A; Grunert KG
Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 20374787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consumer studies on sensory acceptability of boar taint: a review.
Font-i-Furnols M
Meat Sci; 2012 Dec; 92(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 22682684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consumer Perception of Retail Pork Bacon Attributes Using Adaptive Choice-based Conjoint Analysis and Maximum Differential Scaling.
McLean KG; Hanson DJ; Jervis SM; Drake MA
J Food Sci; 2017 Nov; 82(11):2659-2668. PubMed ID: 29058811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consumer preferences for pork chops in five Canadian provinces.
Ngapo TM
Meat Sci; 2017 Jul; 129():102-110. PubMed ID: 28268205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of skatole and androstenone on consumer response towards streaky bacon and pork belly roll.
Aaslyng MD; De Lichtenberg Broge EH; Brockhoff PB; Christensen RH
Meat Sci; 2015 Dec; 110():52-61. PubMed ID: 26186398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Change in Norwegian consumer attitudes towards piglet castration: increased emphasis on animal welfare.
Sødring M; Nafstad O; Håseth TT
Acta Vet Scand; 2020 May; 62(1):22. PubMed ID: 32456651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM
Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Paradoxical consumers in four European countries: Meat-eating justification and willingness to pay for meat from animals treated by alternatives to surgical castration.
Lin-Schilstra L; Fischer ARH
Meat Sci; 2022 Jun; 188():108777. PubMed ID: 35279474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Traditional attributes moo-ve over for some consumer segments: Relative ranking of fluid milk attributes.
Bir C; Widmar NO; Wolf C; Delgado MS
Appetite; 2019 Mar; 134():162-171. PubMed ID: 30550891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
