These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36042064)

  • 1. External validation of the Tyrolean hip arthroplasty registry.
    Wagner M; Neururer S; Dammerer D; Nardelli P; Kaufmann G; Braito M; Brunner A
    J Exp Orthop; 2022 Aug; 9(1):87. PubMed ID: 36042064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome of revised metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a Dutch arthroplasty register study.
    Jelsma J; van Kuijk SMJ; Spekenbrink-Spooren A; Grimm B; Heyligers IC; Schotanus MGM
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Dec; 142(12):4025-4032. PubMed ID: 34846589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do the Revision Rates of Arthroplasty Surgeons Correlate With Postoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Bingham R; Corfield S; Harries D; Harris IA; Vince KG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Jan; 482(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 37339166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of revision data for total hip and knee replacements undertaken at a high volume orthopaedic centre against data held on the National Joint Registry.
    Afzal I; Radha S; Smoljanović T; Stafford GH; Twyman R; Field RE
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Oct; 14(1):318. PubMed ID: 31601231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How do Patient-reported Outcome Scores in International Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries Compare?
    Ingelsrud LH; Wilkinson JM; Overgaard S; Rolfson O; Hallstrom B; Navarro RA; Terner M; Karmakar-Hore S; Webster G; Slawomirski L; Sayers A; Kendir C; de Bienassis K; Klazinga N; Dahl AW; Bohm E
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1884-1896. PubMed ID: 35901444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Arthroplasty registries around the world: valuable sources of hip implant revision risk data.
    Hughes RE; Batra A; Hallstrom BR
    Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med; 2017 Jun; 10(2):240-252. PubMed ID: 28337731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What Can We Learn From Surgeons Who Perform THA and TKA and Have the Lowest Revision Rates? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Lorimer M; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):464-481. PubMed ID: 34677162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jul; 100(13):1132-1140. PubMed ID: 29975265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Harris I; Lorimer MF; Graves SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1952-1970. PubMed ID: 35980886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distributed analysis of hip implants using six national and regional registries: comparing metal-on-metal with metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty in young patients.
    Furnes O; Paxton E; Cafri G; Graves S; Bordini B; Comfort T; Rivas MC; Banerjee S; Sedrakyan A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):25-33. PubMed ID: 25520416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: an analysis of 1,037 revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
    Kuijpers MFL; Hannink G; van Steenbergen LN; Schreurs BW
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Apr; 91(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 31928096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.
    Khatod M; Cafri G; Inacio MC; Schepps AL; Paxton EW; Bini SA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 97(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 25740025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.
    Varnum C
    Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RSA-tested TKA Implants on Average Have Lower Mean 10-year Revision Rates Than Non-RSA-tested Designs.
    Hasan S; Marang-van de Mheen PJ; Kaptein BL; Nelissen RGHH; Pijls BG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1232-1241. PubMed ID: 32187101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Arthroplasty implant registries over the past five decades: Development, current, and future impact.
    Malchau H; Garellick G; Berry D; Harris WH; Robertson O; Kärrlholm J; Lewallen D; Bragdon CR; Lidgren L; Herberts P
    J Orthop Res; 2018 Sep; 36(9):2319-2330. PubMed ID: 29663575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Data Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary Results.
    Bautista MP; Bonilla GA; Mieth KW; Llinás AM; Rodríguez F; Cárdenas LL;
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jul; 32(7):2065-2069. PubMed ID: 28302461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Dyer C; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 34978538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of outcome data in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of registry data and worldwide non-registry studies from 5 decades.
    Pabinger C; Bridgens A; Berghold A; Wurzer P; Boehler N; Labek G
    Hip Int; 2015; 25(5):394-401. PubMed ID: 25837781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design, Construction, and Early Results of a Formal Local Revision Knee Arthroplasty Registry.
    Visvanathan A; Wilson C; Jackman E; Wong G; Krishnan J
    J Knee Surg; 2021 Oct; 34(12):1284-1295. PubMed ID: 32294773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.