These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36042847)

  • 1. A new method for characterising shared space use networks using animal trapping data.
    Wanelik KM; Farine DR
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2022; 76(9):127. PubMed ID: 36042847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linking social and pathogen transmission networks using microbial genetics in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis).
    VanderWaal KL; Atwill ER; Isbell LA; McCowan B
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Mar; 83(2):406-14. PubMed ID: 24117416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the density of small mammals using the selfie trap is an effective camera trapping method.
    Gracanin A; Minchinton TE; Mikac KM
    Mamm Res; 2022; 67(4):467-482. PubMed ID: 35891629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Commensal bacterial sharing does not predict host social associations in kangaroos.
    Proboste T; Corvalan P; Clark N; Beyer HL; Goldizen AW; Seddon JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Nov; 88(11):1696-1707. PubMed ID: 31297802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Network transmission inference: host behavior and parasite life cycle make social networks meaningful in disease ecology.
    Grear DA; Luong LT; Hudson PJ
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Dec; 23(8):1906-14. PubMed ID: 24555316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing transmission potential networks based on social network surveys, close contacts and environmental overlap in rural Madagascar.
    Kauffman K; Werner CS; Titcomb G; Pender M; Rabezara JY; Herrera JP; Shapiro JT; Solis A; Soarimalala V; Tortosa P; Kramer R; Moody J; Mucha PJ; Nunn C
    J R Soc Interface; 2022 Jan; 19(186):20210690. PubMed ID: 35016555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An empirical demonstration of the effect of study design on density estimations.
    Nawaz MA; Khan BU; Mahmood A; Younas M; Din JU; Sutherland C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13104. PubMed ID: 34162926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis.
    Farine DR; Whitehead H
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Sep; 84(5):1144-63. PubMed ID: 26172345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The ecology of movement and behaviour: a saturated tripartite network for describing animal contacts.
    Manlove K; Aiello C; Sah P; Cummins B; Hudson PJ; Cross PC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1887):. PubMed ID: 30232156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial utilization predicts animal social contact networks are not scale-free.
    James A; McLeod JC; Rouco C; Richardson KS; Tompkins DM
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 Dec; 4(12):171209. PubMed ID: 29308252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural trade-offs can predict rewiring in shrinking social networks.
    Farine DR
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Jan; 90(1):120-130. PubMed ID: 31691962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accounting for space and uncertainty in real-time location system-derived contact networks.
    Farthing TS; Dawson DE; Sanderson MW; Lanzas C
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Jun; 10(11):4702-4715. PubMed ID: 32551054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models?
    Sollmann R; Gardner B; Belant JL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e34575. PubMed ID: 22539949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models.
    Royle JA; Karanth KU; Gopalaswamy AM; Kumar NS
    Ecology; 2009 Nov; 90(11):3233-44. PubMed ID: 19967878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trap configuration and spacing influences parameter estimates in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Sun CC; Fuller AK; Royle JA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88025. PubMed ID: 24505361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Group size and modularity interact to shape the spread of infection and information through animal societies.
    Evans JC; Hodgson DJ; Boogert NJ; Silk MJ
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2021; 75(12):163. PubMed ID: 34866760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trade-offs with telemetry-derived contact networks for infectious disease studies in wildlife.
    Gilbertson MLJ; White LA; Craft ME
    Methods Ecol Evol; 2021 Jan; 12(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 33692875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.
    Gerber BD; Parmenter RR
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 26214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.