234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36045310)
1. Learned distractor rejection persists across target search in a different dimension.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):785-795. PubMed ID: 36045310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing the underlying processes leading to learned distractor rejection: Learned oculomotor avoidance.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1964-1981. PubMed ID: 35386017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature.
Kerzel D; Barras C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learned feature regularities enable suppression of spatially overlapping stimuli.
Thayer DD; Miller M; Giesbrecht B; Sprague TC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):769-784. PubMed ID: 36417129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression.
Failing M; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Wang B; Olivers C; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1291-1303. PubMed ID: 31157536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience.
Vatterott DB; Mozer MC; Vecera SP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):485-499. PubMed ID: 29230673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inhibition continues to guide search under concurrent visual working memory load.
Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
J Vis; 2022 Feb; 22(2):8. PubMed ID: 35156992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distractor ignoring is as effective as target enhancement when incidentally learned but not when explicitly cued.
Addleman DA; Störmer VS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):834-844. PubMed ID: 36229632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Which search are you on? Adapting to color while searching for shape.
Bergmann N; Tünnermann J; Schubö A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):457-477. PubMed ID: 31741316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Category-based attentional capture can be influenced by color- and shape-dimensions independently in the conjunction search task.
Wu X; Wang X; Saab R; Jiang Y
Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13526. PubMed ID: 31953842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flexible weighting of target features based on distractor context.
Lee J; Geng JJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):739-751. PubMed ID: 31741317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
Wang B; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.
Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention.
Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Uengoer M; Schubö A
Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1483-97. PubMed ID: 26338030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
