These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36045310)
41. Qualitative differences in the guidance of attention during single-color and multiple-color visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Grubert A; Eimer M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1433-42. PubMed ID: 23244044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Association between cue lead time and template-for-rejection effect. Tanda T; Kawahara JI Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1880-1889. PubMed ID: 31114955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context. Yu X; Geng JJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):336-353. PubMed ID: 30742475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Asymmetric learning of dynamic spatial regularities in visual search: Robust facilitation of predictable target locations, fragile suppression of distractor locations. Yu H; Allenmark F; Müller HJ; Shi Z J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 May; 49(5):709-724. PubMed ID: 37261775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Benefits from negative templates in easy and difficult search depend on rapid distractor rejection and enhanced guidance. Zhang Z; Sahatdjian R; Carlisle NB Vision Res; 2022 Aug; 197():108031. PubMed ID: 35462088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition? Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes. Berry JH Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference. Barras C; Kerzel D Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Diminished distractor exclusion for magnocellular features near the hand. Thomas T; Sunny MM Exp Brain Res; 2020 Mar; 238(3):761-770. PubMed ID: 32095888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search. Won BY; Geng JJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention. Duncan D; Theeuwes J Cortex; 2020 Oct; 131():54-65. PubMed ID: 32801075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection. Kerzel D; Andres MK Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104158. PubMed ID: 31986352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. On the role of top-down and bottom-up guidance in conjunction search: Singleton interference revisited. Dent K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Aug; 85(6):1784-1810. PubMed ID: 37017865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]