These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36046164)

  • 1. Polyethylene terephthalate clamps: Optimization in endodontic and restorative practices.
    Ferreira E Cunha AF; Madalena IR; Küchler EC; Pereira TL; Honorato R; de Menezes FC; Lepri CP; Oliveira MM
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e621-e624. PubMed ID: 36046164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiopacity of endodontic materials using two models for conversion to millimeters of aluminum.
    Ochoa-RodrÍguez VM; Wilches-Visbal JH; Roma B; Coaguila-Llerena H; Tanomaru-Filho M; GonÇalves A; Spin-Neto R; Faria G
    Braz Oral Res; 2020; 34():e080. PubMed ID: 32696910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiopacity of restorative materials using digital images.
    Salzedas LM; Louzada MJ; de Oliveira Filho AB
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2006 Apr; 14(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 19089047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental Dam Application for Endodontics in Dogs-A Novel Clamp Kit.
    Cardoso M; Noites R; Catré D; Paulo M; Viegas C
    J Vet Dent; 2018 Jun; 35(2):138-142. PubMed ID: 29865984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental dam clamp adaptation method on carved gypsum cast.
    Cazacu NC
    J Med Life; 2014; 7(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 25713609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements.
    Wadhwani C; Hess T; Faber T; Piñeyro A; Chen CS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 20416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Radiopacity of Bulk-fill Flowable Composites Using Digital Radiography.
    Tarcin B; Gumru B; Peker S; Ovecoglu HS
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(4):424-31. PubMed ID: 27045286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiopacity of restorative composites by conventional radiograph and digital images with different resolutions.
    Dantas RV; Sarmento HR; Duarte RM; Meireles Monte Raso SS; de Andrade AK; Dos Anjos-Pontual ML
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2013 Sep; 43(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 24083207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiopacity of resin-based materials measured in film radiographs and storage phosphor plate (Digora).
    Sabbagh J; Vreven J; Leloup G
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):677-84. PubMed ID: 15646224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of radiopacity of current restorative CAD/CAM blocks with digital radiography.
    Atala MH; Atala N; Yeğin E; Bayrak S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Jan; 31(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 30302898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the radiopacity of restorative materials with different structures and thicknesses using a digital radiography system.
    Yaylacı A; Karaarslan ES; Hatırlı H
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Sep; 51(3):261-269. PubMed ID: 34621653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography.
    An SY; An CH; Choi KS; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Jun; 48(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 29963480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiopacity evaluation of Portland and MTA-based cements by digital radiographic system.
    Borges AH; Pedro FL; Semanoff-Segundo A; Miranda CE; Pécora JD; Cruz Filho AM
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 21625738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of radiopacity of restorative composite resins with various target distances and exposure times and a modified aluminum step wedge.
    Poorsattar Bejeh Mir A; Poorsattar Bejeh Mir M
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Sep; 42(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 23071966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of winged versus wingless rubber dam clamps in single tooth isolation - A randomized clinical study.
    Doshi RJ; Shah NC; Mohan Kumar RS; Shah R; Kotecha N
    J Conserv Dent; 2023; 26(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 37205893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of various irrigant and autoclaving regimes on the fracture resistance of rubber dam clamps.
    Sutton J; Saunders WP
    Int Endod J; 1996 Sep; 29(5):335-43. PubMed ID: 9206417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of conventional and digital radiography systems with regard to radiopacity of root canal filling materials.
    Akcay I; Ilhan B; Dundar N
    Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):730-6. PubMed ID: 22458866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiopacity of dental restorative materials.
    Hitij T; Fidler A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 May; 17(4):1167-77. PubMed ID: 22824916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of novel customized cushees during rubber dam isolation using self-designed evaluation criteria: A randomized clinical study.
    Shah NC; Kothari MA; Patel PP; Patel JJ; Arora A
    J Conserv Dent; 2021; 24(3):241-245. PubMed ID: 35035148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.