These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3604620)

  • 1. Low- versus high-viscosity bone cement. Fixation of hip prostheses analyzed by roentgen stereophotogrammetry.
    Mjöberg B; Rydholm A; Selvik G; Onnerfält R
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1987 Apr; 58(2):106-8. PubMed ID: 3604620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early detection of prosthetic-hip loosening. Comparison of low- and high-viscosity bone cement.
    Mjöberg B; Franzén H; Selvik G
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1990 Jun; 61(3):273-4. PubMed ID: 2371828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loosening of the cemented hip prosthesis. The importance of heat injury.
    Mjöberg B
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1986; 221():1-40. PubMed ID: 3468743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low- vs high-viscosity cement in hip arthroplasty. No radiographic difference in 226 arthrosis cases followed for 5 years.
    Carlsson AS; Nilsson JA; Blomgren G; Josefsson G; Lindberg LT; Onnerfält R
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1993 Jun; 64(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 8322577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical loosening of total hip prostheses. A radiographic and roentgen stereophotogrammetric study.
    Mjöberg B; Selvik G; Hansson LI; Rosenqvist R; Onnerfält R
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1986 Nov; 68(5):770-4. PubMed ID: 3782242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixation and loosening of hip prostheses. A review.
    Mjöberg B
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1991 Oct; 62(5):500-8. PubMed ID: 1950502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of cement viscosity and cement mantle thickness on migration of the Exeter total hip prosthesis.
    Nelissen RG; Garling EH; Valstar ER
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 16124971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiographic and clinical analysis of cementless acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty.
    Zhang H; Pei FX; Yang J; Shen B; Shi R
    Chin J Traumatol; 2005 Oct; 8(5):263-8. PubMed ID: 16176755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plain radiographs inadequate for evaluation of the cement-bone interface in the hip prosthesis. A cadaver study of femoral stems.
    Jacobs ME; Koeweiden EM; Slooff TJ; Huiskes R; van Horn JR
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1989 Oct; 60(5):541-3. PubMed ID: 2603653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of polyethylene wear in acetabular components inserted with and without cement. A randomized trial.
    Devane PA; Robinson EJ; Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; Nayak NN; Horne JG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 May; 79(5):682-9. PubMed ID: 9160940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of the type of cement on early revision of Charnley total hip prostheses. A review of eight thousand five hundred and seventy-nine primary arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Havelin LI; Espehaug B; Vollset SE; Engesaeter LB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Oct; 77(10):1543-50. PubMed ID: 7593063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of modern cement technique on acetabular fixation total hip arthroplasty. A retrospective study in matched pairs.
    Ranawat CS; Rawlins BA; Harju VT
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1988 Jul; 19(3):599-603. PubMed ID: 3288936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision total hip arthroplasty. Current role of polymethylmethacrylate.
    Wilson PD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Dec; (225):218-28. PubMed ID: 3315376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
    Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Borderline indications for use of cement in total joint replacements.
    Jasty M; Mulroy R; Harris WH
    Chir Organi Mov; 1992; 77(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 1297573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
    Clohisy JC; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Autogenous bone grafts from the femoral head for the treatment of acetabular deficiency in primary total hip arthroplasty with cement. Long-term results.
    Rodriguez JA; Huk OL; Pellicci PM; Wilson PD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Aug; 77(8):1227-33. PubMed ID: 7642669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface replacement of the hip in chronic arthritis. A clinical, radiographic and roentgen stereophotogrammetric evaluation.
    Mogensen B; Ekelund L; Hansson LI; Lidgren L; Selvik G
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1982 Dec; 53(6):929-36. PubMed ID: 7180406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of cement viscosity on the early migration of a tapered polished femoral stem.
    Glyn-Jones S; Hicks J; Alfaro-Adrian J; Gill HS; McLardy-Smith P; Murray DW
    Int Orthop; 2003; 27(6):362-5. PubMed ID: 12915952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.