These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36046694)

  • 1. A Retrospective Study Comparing Nose, Lip, and Chin Morphology in Class I, Class II, and Class III Skeletal Relationships in Patients Visiting to the Department of Orthodontics, BPKIHS: A Cephalometric Study.
    Chaudhary A; Giri J; Gyawali R; Pokharel PR
    Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():2252746. PubMed ID: 36046694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric analysis.
    Joshi M; Wu LP; Maharjan S; Regmi MR
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():8. PubMed ID: 26061982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
    Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [
    Zhou ZJ; Chen Y; Lin YJ; Sun YT; Wang TG; Mao LX; Liu JQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 34645237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
    Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term hard and soft tissue changes after mandibular advancement surgery in Class II patients: a retrospective cephalometric study.
    Storms AS; Miclotte A; Grosjean L; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Alqerban A; Fieuws S; Sun Y; Politis C; Verdonck A; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Oct; 39(5):567-576. PubMed ID: 28204270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between malocclusion, soft tissue profile, and pharyngeal airways: A cephalometric study.
    Lopatienė K; Šidlauskas A; Vasiliauskas A; Čečytė L; Švalkauskienė V; Šidlauskas M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2016; 52(5):307-314. PubMed ID: 27816426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study on the effect of chin morphology on orthodontic treatment.
    Fu Y; Li Z; Zhao M; Shi R
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 41(4):443-449. PubMed ID: 37474477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Facial Soft Tissue Dimensions in Adult Patients with Different Sagittal Skeletal Classes using Cone beam Computed Tomography.
    Jazmati HM; Ajaj MA; Hajeer MY
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 27595719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Influence of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions on the Harmony of the Human Face Profile.
    Perović T
    Med Sci Monit; 2017 Nov; 23():5589-5598. PubMed ID: 29170363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Male and Female Characteristics of Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in Different Orthodontic Malocclusions Evaluated by Cephalometric Radiography.
    Perović T; Blažej Z
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 May; 24():3415-3424. PubMed ID: 29791323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender differences in lower facial soft tissue thickness among different skeletal patterns, based on soft tissue cephalometric analysis.
    Alhumadi A; Al-Khafaji TJ; Hussein Alyassiri AM; Alhamadi WW
    J Orthod Sci; 2022; 11():54. PubMed ID: 36411805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue change gradients after mandibular setback surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Lim YK; Chu EH; Lee DY; Yang IH; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):896-903. PubMed ID: 20578861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study.
    Khan AR; Fida M; Sukhia RH
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 31257136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three-dimensional soft-tissue evaluations between skeletal and pseudo-class III malocclusions.
    Kale B; Buyukcavus MH
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):14717. PubMed ID: 32895440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.