268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36047023)
1. Thirty years of experience with instrumented femoral impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished Exeter stem : a prospective cohort study of 208 revision arthroplasties performed between 1991 and 2007.
Özdemir E; Kuijpers MFL; Visser J; Schreurs BW; Rijnen WHC
Bone Joint J; 2022 Sep; 104-B(9):1039-1046. PubMed ID: 36047023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre.
Wilson MJ; Hook S; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 27909122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The outcome of femoral component revision arthroplasty with impaction allograft bone grafting and a cemented polished Exeter stem: A prospective cohort study of 208 revision arthroplasties with a mean follow-up of ten years.
te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Bone Joint J; 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):771-9. PubMed ID: 26033056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impaction bone grafting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty with Exeter stem in Japan: An extended 10- to 15-year stem survival analysis of the previously reported series.
Iwase T; Otsuka H; Katayama N; Fujita H
J Orthop Sci; 2024 Jan; 29(1):151-156. PubMed ID: 36610839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?
Verspeek J; Nijenhuis TA; Kuijpers MFL; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 32898047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years and the outcome of subsequent revisions.
Schmitz MW; Busch VJ; Gardeniers JW; Hendriks JC; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jan; 14():37. PubMed ID: 23339294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impaction bone grafting in hip re-revision surgery.
Garcia-Rey E; Saldaña L; Garcia-Cimbrelo E
Bone Joint J; 2021 Mar; 103-B(3):492-499. PubMed ID: 33641418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of Severe Acetabular Bone Defect after Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Impaction Bone Grafting and Metal Mesh.
Yang C; Zhu K; Dai H; Zhang X; Wang Q; Wang Q
Orthop Surg; 2023 Mar; 15(3):750-757. PubMed ID: 36644857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medium-term follow-up of 92 femoral component revisions using a third-generation cementing technique.
Te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; Van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Acta Orthop; 2016; 87(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 26569495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The outcome of subsequent revisions after primary total hip arthroplasty in 1,049 patients aged under 50 years : a single-centre cohort study with a follow-up of more than 30 years.
Kuijpers MFL; Colo E; Schmitz MWJL; Hannink G; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW
Bone Joint J; 2022 Mar; 104-B(3):368-375. PubMed ID: 35227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem: a concise follow-up, at fifteen to twenty years, of a previous report.
te Stroet MA; Gardeniers JW; Verdonschot N; Rijnen WH; Slooff TJ; Schreurs BW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):e1731-4. PubMed ID: 23224393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cement-in-cement femoral revisions using a specially designed polished short revision stem; 24 consecutive stems followed for five to seven years.
te Stroet MA; Moret-Wever SG; de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
Hip Int; 2014; 24(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 24970322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.
Te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3867-75. PubMed ID: 25894808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. Surgical technique.
Schreurs BW; Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 2():259-74. PubMed ID: 16951098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem.
Schreurs BW; Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Nov; 87(11):2499-507. PubMed ID: 16264127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acetabular re-revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup; a biological option for successive reconstructions.
Schreurs BW; Te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW
Hip Int; 2015; 25(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 25362880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting].
de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A811. PubMed ID: 20482927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of a long stem cemented femoral component in revision total hip replacement: a follow-up study of five to 16 years.
Te Stroet MA; Bronsema E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
Bone Joint J; 2014 Sep; 96-B(9):1207-13. PubMed ID: 25183592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of long cemented stems for femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Sierra RJ; Charity J; Tsiridis E; Timperley JA; Gie GA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18519328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
