BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36047771)

  • 1. Most cancers carry a substantial deleterious load due to Hill-Robertson interference.
    Tilk S; Tkachenko S; Curtis C; Petrov DA; McFarland CD
    Elife; 2022 Sep; 11():. PubMed ID: 36047771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Evolving Genetic Architecture Interacts with Hill-Robertson Interference to Determine the Benefit of Sex.
    Whitlock AO; Peck KM; Azevedo RB; Burch CL
    Genetics; 2016 Jun; 203(2):923-36. PubMed ID: 27098911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of advantageous mutations in enhancing the evolution of a recombination modifier.
    Hartfield M; Otto SP; Keightley PD
    Genetics; 2010 Apr; 184(4):1153-64. PubMed ID: 20139345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation.
    McVean GA; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2000 Jun; 155(2):929-44. PubMed ID: 10835411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic linkage and natural selection.
    Barton NH
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Aug; 365(1552):2559-69. PubMed ID: 20643746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recombination Rate Variation Modulates Gene Sequence Evolution Mainly via GC-Biased Gene Conversion, Not Hill-Robertson Interference, in an Avian System.
    BolĂ­var P; Mugal CF; Nater A; Ellegren H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jan; 33(1):216-27. PubMed ID: 26446902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution at linked sites.
    Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2012 Jan; 190(1):5-22. PubMed ID: 22219506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relations between recombination rate and patterns of molecular variation and evolution in Drosophila.
    Charlesworth B; Campos JL
    Annu Rev Genet; 2014; 48():383-403. PubMed ID: 25251853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hill-Robertson interference is a minor determinant of variations in codon bias across Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes.
    Marais G; Piganeau G
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Sep; 19(9):1399-406. PubMed ID: 12200468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hill-Robertson interference maintained by Red Queen dynamics favours the evolution of sex.
    da Silva J; Galbraith JD
    J Evol Biol; 2017 May; 30(5):994-1010. PubMed ID: 28295769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
    Keightley PD; Otto SP
    Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Negative linkage disequilibrium between amino acid changing variants reveals interference among deleterious mutations in the human genome.
    Garcia JA; Lohmueller KE
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009676. PubMed ID: 34319975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relation between recombination rate and patterns of molecular evolution and variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Campos JL; Halligan DL; Haddrill PR; Charlesworth B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 31(4):1010-28. PubMed ID: 24489114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive Evolution Is Substantially Impeded by Hill-Robertson Interference in Drosophila.
    Castellano D; Coronado-Zamora M; Campos JL; Barbadilla A; Eyre-Walker A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Feb; 33(2):442-55. PubMed ID: 26494843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective Interference and the Evolution of Sex.
    Otto SP
    J Hered; 2021 Mar; 112(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 33047117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic recombination and molecular evolution.
    Charlesworth B; Betancourt AJ; Kaiser VB; Gordo I
    Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009; 74():177-86. PubMed ID: 19734202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Highly variable recombinational landscape modulates efficacy of natural selection in birds.
    Gossmann TI; Santure AW; Sheldon BC; Slate J; Zeng K
    Genome Biol Evol; 2014 Aug; 6(8):2061-75. PubMed ID: 25062920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila.
    Comeron JM; Guthrie TB
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2519-30. PubMed ID: 16120803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Local effects of limited recombination: historical perspective and consequences for population estimates of adaptive evolution.
    Williford A; Comeron JM
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S127-34. PubMed ID: 20421321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Hill-Robertson effect: evolutionary consequences of weak selection and linkage in finite populations.
    Comeron JM; Williford A; Kliman RM
    Heredity (Edinb); 2008 Jan; 100(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 17878920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.