These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36048014)

  • 1. Dobbs and the future of health data privacy for patients and healthcare organizations.
    Clayton EW; EmbĂ­ PJ; Malin BA
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2022 Dec; 30(1):155-160. PubMed ID: 36048014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Assessment of Perspectives and Concerns Among Research Participants of Childbearing Age Regarding the Health-Relatedness of Data, Online Data Privacy, and Donating Data to Researchers: Survey Study.
    Hendricks-Sturrup R; Lu CY
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Mar; 25():e41937. PubMed ID: 36897637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Dobbs Double Bind: Lessons From Substance Use Disorder on the Conflict Between Privacy and Quality Care.
    Simon MA; O'Brian CA; Post SL
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 66(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 36657046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. Lawall.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2002; 307():783-94. PubMed ID: 16477720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion counseling: to benefit maternal health.
    Steinberg TN
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):483-517. PubMed ID: 2699161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Post-Roe Political Landscape Demands a Morality of Caution for Women's Health.
    Goodday S; Karlin D; Suver C; Friend S
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Oct; 24(10):e41417. PubMed ID: 36264611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health information: reconciling personal privacy with the public good of human health.
    Gostin LO
    Health Care Anal; 2001; 9(3):321-35. PubMed ID: 11794835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.
    Byron JJ; Avalos M; Xiao KA; Klein AA; Leheste JR
    Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32100. PubMed ID: 36601141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Privacy, confidentiality and abortion statistics: a question of public interest?
    McHale JV; Jones J
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Jan; 38(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 21708829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion.
    Macklin R
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 36398395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 379():531-57. PubMed ID: 16477726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
    Benshoof J
    Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
    Koslov TI
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion: in search of a constitutional doctrine (Part 1).
    Leyshon DJ
    Med Law; 1991; 10(2):155-83. PubMed ID: 1886465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of health care experience and consumer information efficacy in shaping privacy and security perceptions of medical records: national consumer survey results.
    Patel V; Beckjord E; Moser RP; Hughes P; Hesse BW
    JMIR Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 3(2):e14. PubMed ID: 25843686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Northwestern Memorial Hospital v. Ashcroft.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 362():923-40. PubMed ID: 16477725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Keep Your Friends Close and Your Medical Records Closer: Defining the Extent to Which a Constitutional Right to Informational Privacy Protects Medical Records.
    Newman L
    J Law Health; 2019; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 31087828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.