These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36048058)

  • 1. People express more bias in their predictions than in their likelihood judgments.
    Park I; Windschitl PD; Miller JE; Smith AR; Stuart JO; Biangmano M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 36048058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The desirability bias in predictions under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty.
    Windschitl PD; Miller JE; Park I; Rule S; Clary A; Smith AR
    Cognition; 2022 Dec; 229():105254. PubMed ID: 36029552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.
    Hoffart JC; Rieskamp J; Dutilh G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):219-231. PubMed ID: 30024248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does constructing a belief distribution truly reduce overconfidence?
    Hu B; Simmons JP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Feb; 152(2):571-589. PubMed ID: 36095168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motivated perception of probabilistic information.
    Lench HC; Smallman R; Darbor KE; Bench SW
    Cognition; 2014 Nov; 133(2):429-42. PubMed ID: 25151252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous underweighting and overestimation of rare events: Unpacking a paradox.
    Szollosi A; Liang G; Konstantinidis E; Donkin C; Newell BR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Dec; 148(12):2207-2217. PubMed ID: 31033320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mental jenga: A counterfactual simulation model of causal judgments about physical support.
    Zhou L; Smith KA; Tenenbaum JB; Gerstenberg T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Aug; 152(8):2237-2269. PubMed ID: 37093666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Making sense of surprise: an investigation of the factors influencing surprise judgments.
    Maguire R; Maguire P; Keane MT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):176-86. PubMed ID: 21244113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overestimating the valuations and preferences of others.
    Jung MH; Moon A; Nelson LD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jun; 149(6):1193-1214. PubMed ID: 31750709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A unified explanation of variability and bias in human probability judgments: How computational noise explains the mean-variance signature.
    Sundh J; Zhu JQ; Chater N; Sanborn A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Oct; 152(10):2842-2860. PubMed ID: 37199970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expectations affect physical causation judgments.
    Gerstenberg T; Icard T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 31512904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size bias in judgments of perceptual averages.
    Price PC; Kimura NM; Smith AR; Marshall LD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1321-31. PubMed ID: 24749965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reasoners consider alternative causes in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Aßfalg A; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2188-2208. PubMed ID: 30998074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive Anchoring Model: How Static and Dynamic Presentations of Time Series Influence Judgments and Predictions.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Tsaneva-Atanasova K; Juliusson A; Chater N
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 42(1):77-102. PubMed ID: 28382639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cultural variation in social judgments of smiles: The role of ideal affect.
    Tsai JL; Blevins E; Bencharit LZ; Chim L; Fung HH; Yeung DY
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Jun; 116(6):966-988. PubMed ID: 29902026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the subjective quality of social justice: the role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments.
    van den Bos K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Sep; 85(3):482-98. PubMed ID: 14498784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do People Prescribe Optimism, Overoptimism, or Neither?
    Miller JE; Park I; Smith AR; Windschitl PD
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Oct; 32(10):1605-1616. PubMed ID: 34473591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-transcendence or self-enhancement: People's perceptions of meaning and happiness in relation to the self.
    Huang M; Yang F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Feb; 152(2):590-610. PubMed ID: 36174172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When "bad" is good: How evaluative judgments eliminate the standard anchoring effect.
    Schweickart O; Tam C; Brown NR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 75(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32597668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.