These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36048058)

  • 21. When "bad" is good: How evaluative judgments eliminate the standard anchoring effect.
    Schweickart O; Tam C; Brown NR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 75(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32597668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bias in confidence: A critical test for discrete-state models of change detection.
    Winiger S; Singmann H; Kellen D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Mar; 47(3):387-401. PubMed ID: 33030942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Listening to your intuition in the face of distraction: Effects of taxing working memory on accuracy and bias of intuitive judgments of semantic coherence.
    Maldei T; Koole SL; Baumann N
    Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103975. PubMed ID: 31234115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. People systematically update moral judgments of blame.
    Monroe AE; Malle BF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Feb; 116(2):215-236. PubMed ID: 30359071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Actions speak louder than outcomes in judgments of prosocial behavior.
    Yudkin DA; Prosser AMB; Crockett MJ
    Emotion; 2019 Oct; 19(7):1138-1147. PubMed ID: 30475039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The short-term stability of life satisfaction judgments.
    Lucas RE; Freedman VA; Cornman JC
    Emotion; 2018 Oct; 18(7):1024-1031. PubMed ID: 28872337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scene memories are biased toward high-probability views.
    Lin F; Hafri A; Bonner MF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1116-1129. PubMed ID: 35980704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Yielding to desire: the durability of affective preferences.
    Rapp DN; Jacovina ME; Slaten DG; Krause E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1419-31. PubMed ID: 24933694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Uncertainty information that is irrelevant for report impacts confidence judgments.
    Spence ML; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1981-1994. PubMed ID: 30475052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are people excessive or judicious in their egocentrism? A modeling approach to understanding bias and accuracy in people's optimism.
    Windschitl PD; Rose JP; Stalkfleet MT; Smith AR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 95(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 18665701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Heuristics can produce surprisingly rational probability estimates: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 26709414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Competitive retrieval strategy causes multimodal response distributions in multiple-cue judgments.
    Albrecht R; Hoffmann JA; Pleskac TJ; Rieskamp J; von Helversen B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1064-1090. PubMed ID: 31750721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):168-85. PubMed ID: 21219081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of false statements on visual perception hinge on social suggestibility.
    Anlló H; Watanabe K; Sackur J; de Gardelle V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Aug; 48(8):889-900. PubMed ID: 35666923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What drives increases in hindsight impressions after the reception of biased media content?
    Meuer M; von der Beck I; Nestler S; Oeberst A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Sep; 27(3):461-472. PubMed ID: 34582246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Frequency, probability, and prediction: easy solutions to cognitive illusions?
    Griffin D; Buehler R
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):48-78. PubMed ID: 10090798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. And the winner is . . . ? Forecasting the outcome of others' competitive efforts.
    Kupor D; Brucks MS; Huang SC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):500-521. PubMed ID: 31120289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How people use information about changes in infections and disease prevalence.
    Jung H; Albarracín D
    Health Psychol; 2023 Jun; 42(6):388-402. PubMed ID: 36729484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Truth is in the mind, but beauty is in the eye: Fluency effects are moderated by a match between fluency source and judgment dimension.
    Vogel T; Silva RR; Thomas A; Wänke M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Aug; 149(8):1587-1596. PubMed ID: 31944810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.