147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36050158)
21. [Analysis of verification results of protective effects of hearing protectors in different industries].
Shi HX; Su SB; Liu M; Li RZ; Wang TJ; Xiao B
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2023 May; 41(5):333-337. PubMed ID: 37248077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
Chiu CC; Wan TJ
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.
Murphy WJ; Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Shaw PB; Stergar M
Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):364-73. PubMed ID: 26356380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. CE Module: Improving Hearing Protection Device Noise Attenuation through Fit-Testing in an Occupational Health Clinic.
Workplace Health Saf; 2022 Apr; 70(4):205-206. PubMed ID: 35416096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Speech recognition in noise under hearing protection: A computational study of the combined effects of hearing loss and hearing protector attenuation.
Giguère C; Berger EH
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 1():S30-40. PubMed ID: 26840922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Individual fit-testing of earplugs: a review of uses.
Schulz TY
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):152-62. PubMed ID: 21368441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fit-testing hearing protectors: an idea whose time has come.
Hager LD
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):147-51. PubMed ID: 21368440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Adequacy of personal hearing protection devices].
Peretti A; Pedrielli F; di Bisceglie AP; Bonomini F
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2010; 32(4 Suppl):267-70. PubMed ID: 21438278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Attitudes toward use of hearing protection devices and effects of an intervention on fit-testing results.
Smith PS; Monaco BA; Lusk SL
Workplace Health Saf; 2014 Dec; 62(12):491-9. PubMed ID: 25207586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Individual fit testing of hearing protection devices.
Voix J; Hager LD
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 19534854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating the effect of training along with fit testing on foam earplug users in four factories in China.
Gong W; Liu X; Liu Y; Li L
Int J Audiol; 2019 May; 58(5):269-277. PubMed ID: 30880506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluating Earplug Performance over a 2-Hour Work Period with a Fit-Test System.
Gong W; Murphy WJ; Meinke DK; Feng HA; Stephenson MR
Semin Hear; 2023 Nov; 44(4):470-484. PubMed ID: 37818150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of earplug training on noise protection.
Kim JW; Yang S; Chung I; Lee MY
Ann Occup Environ Med; 2019; 31():e34. PubMed ID: 31915525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Out of sound is out of sight: hearing protection falls short.
Read HP
Occup Health Saf; 1988 Feb; 57(2):17, 57-8. PubMed ID: 3357672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.
Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Camp JE; Cohen MA; Stebbins JG
Occup Environ Med; 2006 May; 63(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16551755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Combat Workplace Noise Pollution to Help Prevent Hearing Loss.
Padron M
Occup Health Saf; 2015 Sep; 84(9):106-8. PubMed ID: 26495634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Research on the protective effect of hearing protective device for workers exposed to noise in a motor manufacturing enterprise].
Zhong X; Fu SJ; Zhu JW; Li X; Shi B; Su SB
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 41(11):814-818. PubMed ID: 38073207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Perception of hearing protectors by workers that participate in hearing preservation programs: a preliminary study.
Gonçalves CG; Lüders D; Guirado DS; Albizu EJ; Marques JM
Codas; 2015; 27(4):309-18. PubMed ID: 26398252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
