These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36050180)

  • 1. The combined effects of contextual predictability and noise on the acoustic realisation of German syllables.
    Ibrahim O; Yuen I; van Os M; Andreeva B; Möbius B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):911. PubMed ID: 36050180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic changes in the production of lexical stress during Lombard speech.
    Arciuli J; Simpson BS; Vogel AP; Ballard KJ
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):149-62. PubMed ID: 25102603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech produced in noise: Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustic and durational parameters.
    Graetzer S; Bottalico P; Hunter EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):974. PubMed ID: 28863615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis.
    Dubno JR; Levitt H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):249-61. PubMed ID: 7217523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic characteristics of English lexical stress produced by native Mandarin speakers.
    Zhang Y; Nissen SL; Francis AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4498-513. PubMed ID: 18537399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conversational and clear speech intelligibility of /bVd/ syllables produced by native and non-native English speakers.
    Rogers CL; DeMasi TM; Krause JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):410-23. PubMed ID: 20649235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fundamental frequency range and other acoustic factors that might contribute to the clear-speech benefit.
    Han HJ; Munson B; Schlauch RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Mar; 149(3):1685. PubMed ID: 33765811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability.
    Turnbull R
    Lang Speech; 2017 Mar; 60(1):123-153. PubMed ID: 28326986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions.
    Hazan V; Baker R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2139-52. PubMed ID: 21973368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word informativity influences acoustic duration: effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation.
    Seyfarth S
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):140-55. PubMed ID: 25019178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic characteristics of Mandarin esophageal speech.
    Liu H; Wan M; Wang S; Wang X; Lu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1016-25. PubMed ID: 16158657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low- and high-frequency cortical brain oscillations reflect dissociable mechanisms of concurrent speech segregation in noise.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2018 Apr; 361():92-102. PubMed ID: 29398142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners.
    Cutler A; Weber A; Smits R; Cooper N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3668-78. PubMed ID: 15658717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception and Acoustic Studies of Vowel Intelligibility in Dysphonic Speech.
    Ishikawa K; Nudelman C; Park S; Ketring C
    J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):659.e11-659.e24. PubMed ID: 31952898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech Recognition in Nonnative versus Native English-Speaking College Students in a Virtual Classroom.
    Neave-DiToro D; Rubinstein A; Neuman AC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):404-414. PubMed ID: 28534731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
    Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognition of speech produced in noise.
    Pittman AL; Wiley TL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 44(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 11407555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.