184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36050232)
1. Microbubble-Assisted Ultrasound for Imaging and Therapy of Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Avry F; Mousset C; Oujagir E; Bouakaz A; Gouilleux-Gruart V; Thépault RA; Renault S; Marouillat S; Machet L; Escoffre JM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Nov; 48(11):2174-2198. PubMed ID: 36050232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microbubble-mediated ultrasound drug-delivery and therapeutic monitoring.
Sennoga CA; Kanbar E; Auboire L; Dujardin PA; Fouan D; Escoffre JM; Bouakaz A
Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2017 Sep; 14(9):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 27892760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging with ultrasound contrast agents: current status and future.
Chong WK; Papadopoulou V; Dayton PA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Apr; 43(4):762-772. PubMed ID: 29508011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound contrast agents: microbubbles made simple for the pediatric radiologist.
Sridharan A; Eisenbrey JR; Forsberg F; Lorenz N; Steffgen L; Ntoulia A
Pediatr Radiol; 2021 Nov; 51(12):2117-2127. PubMed ID: 34117892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Porphyrin-grafted Lipid Microbubbles for the Enhanced Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy in Prostate Cancer through Ultrasound-controlled
You Y; Liang X; Yin T; Chen M; Qiu C; Gao C; Wang X; Mao Y; Qu E; Dai Z; Zheng R
Theranostics; 2018; 8(6):1665-1677. PubMed ID: 29556348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vascular applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Mehta KS; Lee JJ; Taha AG; Avgerinos E; Chaer RA
J Vasc Surg; 2017 Jul; 66(1):266-274. PubMed ID: 28390769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nanobubbles are Non-Echogenic for Fundamental-Mode Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.
Myers JZ; Navarro-Becerra JA; Borden MA
Bioconjug Chem; 2022 Jun; 33(6):1106-1113. PubMed ID: 35476906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perfusion-guided sonopermeation of neuroblastoma: a novel strategy for monitoring and predicting liposomal doxorubicin uptake
Bellary A; Villarreal A; Eslami R; Undseth QJ; Lec B; Defnet AM; Bagrodia N; Kandel JJ; Borden MA; Shaikh S; Chopra R; Laetsch TW; Delaney LJ; Shaw CM; Eisenbrey JR; Hernandez SL; Sirsi SR
Theranostics; 2020; 10(18):8143-8161. PubMed ID: 32724463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Progress of ultrasound microbubble contrast technology in the diagnosis and treatment of clinical diseases].
Qiu L; Leng QY; Luo Y
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Nov; 45(6):974-8. PubMed ID: 25571727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic and therapeutic research on ultrasound microbubble/nanobubble contrast agents (Review).
Ma J; Xu CS; Gao F; Chen M; Li F; Du LF
Mol Med Rep; 2015 Sep; 12(3):4022-4028. PubMed ID: 26081968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the detection of metastatic superficial lymph nodes in melanoma patients.
Rubaltelli L; Beltrame V; Scagliori E; Bezzon E; Frigo AC; Rastrelli M; Stramare R
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Feb; 35(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 23860858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents for diagnostic and therapeutic applications: current status and future design.
Kang ST; Yeh CK
Chang Gung Med J; 2012; 35(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 22537927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular imaging agents for ultrasound.
Zlitni A; Gambhir SS
Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2018 Aug; 45():113-120. PubMed ID: 29631121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Westwood M; Joore M; Grutters J; Redekop K; Armstrong N; Lee K; Gloy V; Raatz H; Misso K; Severens J; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(16):1-243. PubMed ID: 23611316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of microcirculation by contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a new approach in vascular medicine.
Kaspar M; Partovi S; Aschwanden M; Imfeld S; Baldi T; Uthoff H; Staub D
Swiss Med Wkly; 2015; 145():w14047. PubMed ID: 25588141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound and microbubble mediated therapeutic delivery: Underlying mechanisms and future outlook.
Chowdhury SM; Abou-Elkacem L; Lee T; Dahl J; Lutz AM
J Control Release; 2020 Oct; 326():75-90. PubMed ID: 32554041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound and microbubble-assisted gene delivery: recent advances and ongoing challenges.
Delalande A; Postema M; Mignet N; Midoux P; Pichon C
Ther Deliv; 2012 Oct; 3(10):1199-215. PubMed ID: 23116012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monodisperse versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: In Vivo Sensitivity and safety in Rat and Pig.
Helbert A; Gaud E; Segers T; Botteron C; Frinking P; Jeannot V
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3339-3352. PubMed ID: 33008649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artifacts and Technical Considerations at Contrast-enhanced US.
Fetzer DT; Vijay K; Caserta MP; Patterson-Lachowicz A; Dahiya N; Rodgers SK
Radiographics; 2023 Feb; 43(2):e220093. PubMed ID: 36563094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging With Multiplane-Wave Imaging.
Gong P; Song P; Chen S
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Feb; 65(2):178-187. PubMed ID: 29424693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
