These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36050810)

  • 1. An infrastructural account of scientific objectivity for legal contexts and bloodstain pattern analysis.
    Koolage WJ; Williams LM; Barroso ML
    Sci Context; 2021 Mar; 34(1):101-119. PubMed ID: 36050810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subjective from the start: A critique of transformative criticism.
    Milliken A
    Nurs Philos; 2017 Apr; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 28256811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Value management and model pluralism in climate science.
    Jebeile J; Crucifix M
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Aug; 88():120-127. PubMed ID: 34166920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Promoting ethical and objective practice in the medicolegal arena of disability evaluation.
    Martelli MF; Zasler ND; Johnson-Greene D
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2001 Aug; 12(3):571-85. PubMed ID: 11478189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to think about shared norms and pluralism without circularity: A reply to Anna Leuschner.
    Eigi J
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Jun; 75():51-56. PubMed ID: 31426947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objectivity in science and law: A shared rescue strategy.
    Burch M; Furman K
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 64():60-70. PubMed ID: 31122641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A procedural, pragmatist account of ethical objectivity.
    Roth A
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2013 Jun; 23(2):169-200. PubMed ID: 23888836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Evaluating normative epistemic frameworks in medicine: EBM and casuistic medicine".
    Bingeman E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Aug; 22(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 27122441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fleck and the social constitution of scientific objectivity.
    Fagan MB
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2009 Dec; 40(4):272-85. PubMed ID: 19917486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science.
    Harambam J; Aupers S
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 May; 24(4):466-80. PubMed ID: 25452381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical and scientific organizations and scientific evidence in U.S. trials: lessons from European legal theory.
    Deftos LJ
    Acad Med; 1999 Mar; 74(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 10099641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epistemic interests and the objectivity of inquiry.
    Wilholt T
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Feb; 91():86-93. PubMed ID: 34891050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Weakening forensic science in Spain: from expert evidence to documentary evidence.
    Lucena-Molina JJ; Pardo-Iranzo V; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):952-63. PubMed ID: 22329955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Representation and re-presentation in litigation science.
    Jasanoff S
    Environ Health Perspect; 2008 Jan; 116(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 18197311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.
    Picardi N
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():1-3. PubMed ID: 28474609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objectivity is a myth that harms the practice and diversity of forensic science.
    Winburn AP; Clemmons CMJ
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2021; 3():100196. PubMed ID: 34622187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Science, truth, and forensic cultures: the exceptional legal status of DNA evidence.
    Lynch M
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 23117027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.