These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3605474)

  • 1. Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.
    Taffel SM; Placek PJ; Liss T
    Am J Public Health; 1987 Aug; 77(8):955-9. PubMed ID: 3605474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.
    Anderson GM; Lomas J
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Oct; 311(14):887-92. PubMed ID: 6472401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994.
    Gregory KD; Curtin SC; Taffel SM; Notzon FC
    Am J Public Health; 1998 Sep; 88(9):1384-7. PubMed ID: 9736883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
    Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.
    Shiono PH; McNellis D; Rhoads GG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 3574796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cesarean sections in upstate New York, 1968-1978.
    Zdeb MS; Therriault GD; Logrillo VM
    Am J Epidemiol; 1980 Sep; 112(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 7424887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cesarean section: changing incidence and indications.
    Gilstrap LC; Hauth JC; Toussaint S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 6694814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recent patterns in cesarean delivery in the United States.
    Placek PJ; Taffel SM
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1988 Dec; 15(4):607-27. PubMed ID: 3226670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recent trends in cesarean section rates in Ontario.
    Anderson GM; Lomas J
    CMAJ; 1989 Nov; 141(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 2804827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trends in the delivery route of twin pregnancies in the United States, 2006-2013.
    Bateni ZH; Clark SL; Sangi-Haghpeykar H; Aagaard KM; Blumenfeld YJ; Ramin SM; Lee HC; Fox KA; Moaddab A; Shamshirsaz AA; Salmanian B; Hosseinzadeh P; Racusin DA; Erfani H; Espinoza J; Dildy GA; Belfort MA; Shamshirsaz AA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():120-6. PubMed ID: 27591713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Incidence of and indications for cesarean sections in the Quebec, Canada region 1973 and 1979].
    Marcoux S; Fabia J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1983; 31(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 6669773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent trends in cesarean section use in California.
    Stafford RS
    West J Med; 1990 Nov; 153(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 2260286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication.
    Notzon FC; Cnattingius S; Bergsjø P; Cole S; Taffel S; Irgens L; Daltveit AK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 170(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 8116703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Epidemiological surveillance and obstetrical dystocias surgery in Senegal].
    Bouillin D; Fournier G; Gueye A; Diadhiou F; Cissé CT
    Sante; 1994; 4(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 7850191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications in cesarean and non-cesarean deliveries: United States, 1980.
    Taffel SM; Placek PJ
    Am J Public Health; 1983 Aug; 73(8):856-60. PubMed ID: 6869637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cesarean delivery rate can be safely reduced in a developing country.
    de Muylder X; Thiery M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):360-4. PubMed ID: 2304708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cesarean section: medical benefits and costs.
    Shearer EL
    Soc Sci Med; 1993 Nov; 37(10):1223-31. PubMed ID: 8272901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.