These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36055150)

  • 1. Causation analysis of crashes and near crashes using naturalistic driving data.
    Wang X; Liu Q; Guo F; Fang S; Xu X; Chen X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106821. PubMed ID: 36055150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-depth analysis of crash contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions among at-risk drivers using the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study.
    Seacrist T; Maheshwari J; Sarfare S; Chingas G; Thirkill M; Loeb HS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S68-S73. PubMed ID: 34663136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of pre-crash scenarios and contributing factors for autonomous vehicle crashes at intersections.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Liu S; Yu C; Glaser Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107383. PubMed ID: 37984113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of functional scenarios for intersection collisions.
    Bangert LG; Lubash T; Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Riexinger LE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Dec; 193():107326. PubMed ID: 37793217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of teen and adult driver crash scenarios in a nationally representative sample of serious crashes.
    McDonald CC; Curry AE; Kandadai V; Sommers MS; Winston FK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():302-8. PubMed ID: 25103321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crashes and near-crashes on horizontal curves along rural two-lane highways: Analysis of naturalistic driving data.
    Wang B; Hallmark S; Savolainen P; Dong J
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():163-169. PubMed ID: 29203015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of intersection crashes using naturalistic driving data through the lens of future I-ADAS.
    Galloway AJ; Bareiss M; Hasegawa T; Sherony R; Riexinger LE
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(7):577-582. PubMed ID: 37534880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Video from user-generated content as a source of pre-crash scenario naturalistic driving data.
    St Lawrence S; Hallman J; Sherony R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S171-S173. PubMed ID: 33155861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Autonomous driving testing scenario generation based on in-depth vehicle-to-powered two-wheeler crash data in China.
    Wang X; Peng Y; Xu T; Xu Q; Wu X; Xiang G; Yi S; Wang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106812. PubMed ID: 36054982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
    Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Huang E; Megariotis J; Prabahar A; Kashem A; Elzarka A; Haber L; MacKinney T; Loeb H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S89-S96. PubMed ID: 29584473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the combined effects of driving situations on freeway rear-end crash risk using naturalistic driving study data.
    Wu KK; Wang L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105866. PubMed ID: 33276188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A synthetic approach to compare the large truck crash causation study and naturalistic driving data.
    Hickman JS; Hanowski RJ; Bocanegra J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Mar; 112():11-14. PubMed ID: 29306085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In-depth approach for identifying crash causation patterns and its implications for pedestrian crash prevention.
    Yue L; Abdel-Aty M; Wu Y; Zheng O; Yuan J
    J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():119-132. PubMed ID: 32563384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical older driver errors in a national sample of serious U.S. crashes.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jul; 80():211-9. PubMed ID: 25916662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Considering real-world sightline obstructions in crash and injury prevention estimates for left turn across path/opposite direction intersection active safety systems.
    Bareiss M; Gabler HC; Sherony R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S102-S106. PubMed ID: 33026259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario.
    Russo F; Biancardo SA; Dell'Acqua G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24279963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creating pedestrian crash scenarios in a driving simulator environment.
    Chrysler ST; Ahmad O; Schwarz CW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S12-7. PubMed ID: 26027964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Definition of run-off-road crash clusters-For safety benefit estimation and driver assistance development.
    Nilsson D; Lindman M; Victor T; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():97-105. PubMed ID: 29407673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors contributing to commercial vehicle rear-end conflicts in China: A study using on-board event data recorders.
    Bianchi Piccinini G; Engström J; Bärgman J; Wang X
    J Safety Res; 2017 Sep; 62():143-153. PubMed ID: 28882261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.