These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36055884)

  • 1. Using the anterior cranial base to provide a reliable reference plane for patients with or without facial asymmetry.
    Feng B; Yu X; Wang Y; Ouyang W; Wu F; Yu M; Chen Q
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e230-e245. PubMed ID: 36055884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Construction and validity of a midsagittal plane based on the symmetry of a 3-dimensional model of the relevant cranial base.
    Feng B; Wang Y; Ouyang W; Yu M; Wang H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jan; 159(1):e49-e58. PubMed ID: 33357762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography.
    Dobai A; Markella Z; Vízkelety T; Fouquet C; Rosta A; Barabás J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Nov; 79(6):371-379. PubMed ID: 30255320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Novel method of constructing a stable reference frame for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
    Zhang D; Wang S; Li J; Zhou Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 30173843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone-beam computerized tomography.
    Cevidanes LH; Alhadidi A; Paniagua B; Styner M; Ludlow J; Mol A; Turvey T; Proffit WR; Rossouw PE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jun; 111(6):757-70. PubMed ID: 21497527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy and reliability of different midsagittal planes in the symmetry assessment using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Yu S; Zheng Y; Dong L; Huang W; Wu H; Zhang Q; Yan X; Wu W; Lv T; Yuan X
    Clin Anat; 2024 Mar; 37(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 38186377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.
    Shahen S; Lagravère MO; Carrino G; Fahim F; Abdelsalam R; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
    Prog Orthod; 2018 Dec; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 30506410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical shape analysis-based determination of optimal midsagittal reference plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry.
    Shin SM; Kim YM; Kim NR; Choi YS; Park SB; Kim YI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 27476357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal adolescents: cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
    Sanders DA; Chandhoke TK; Uribe FA; Rigali PH; Nanda R
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 24935152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane.
    Park JU; Kook YA; Kim Y
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):860-7. PubMed ID: 22356706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative validity and reproducibility study of various landmark-oriented reference planes in 3-dimensional computed tomographic analysis for patients receiving orthognathic surgery.
    Lin HH; Chuang YF; Weng JL; Lo LJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117604. PubMed ID: 25668209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis.
    Lee JK; Jung PK; Moon CH
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 23758600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography.
    Kwon TG; Park HS; Ryoo HM; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15925488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two methods for quantitative assessment of mandibular asymmetry using cone beam computed tomography image volumes.
    AlHadidi A; Cevidanes LH; Mol A; Ludlow J; Styner M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):351-7. PubMed ID: 21831974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of two midsagittal planes in three-dimensional analysis and their measurement in patients with skeletal mandibular deviation: a comparative study.
    Zheng X; Wang L; Zhang B; Bai X; Qin K; Tian Y; Zhao R; Liu S; Wang J; Zhao Z
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(7):600-606. PubMed ID: 29980353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymmetry index for the photogrammetric assessment of facial asymmetry.
    Blasi A; Nucera R; Ronsivalle V; Candida E; Grippaudo C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Sep; 162(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 35562291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods.
    Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.