These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36056611)
1. The effect of self-generated versus externally generated actions on timing, duration, and amplitude of blood oxygen level dependent response for visual feedback processing. Kavroulakis E; van Kemenade BM; Arikan BE; Kircher T; Straube B Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Nov; 43(16):4954-4969. PubMed ID: 36056611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceiving your hand moving: BOLD suppression in sensory cortices and the role of the cerebellum in the detection of feedback delays. Arikan BE; van Kemenade BM; Podranski K; Steinsträter O; Straube B; Kircher T J Vis; 2019 Dec; 19(14):4. PubMed ID: 31826249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Different responses of the right superior temporal sulcus to visual movement feedback during self-generated vs. externally generated hand movements. Limanowski J; Sarasso P; Blankenburg F Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 47(4):314-320. PubMed ID: 29356166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive perception of self-generated movements: Commonalities and differences in the neural processing of tool and hand actions. Pazen M; Uhlmann L; van Kemenade BM; Steinsträter O; Straube B; Kircher T Neuroimage; 2020 Feb; 206():116309. PubMed ID: 31669300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distinct Roles for the Cerebellum, Angular Gyrus, and Middle Temporal Gyrus in Action-Feedback Monitoring. van Kemenade BM; Arikan BE; Podranski K; Steinsträter O; Kircher T; Straube B Cereb Cortex; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1520-1531. PubMed ID: 29912297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Commonalities and differences in predictive neural processing of discrete vs continuous action feedback. Schmitter CV; Steinsträter O; Kircher T; van Kemenade BM; Straube B Neuroimage; 2021 Apr; 229():117745. PubMed ID: 33454410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hemispheric differences in the processing of visual consequences of active vs. passive movements: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. Straube B; Schülke R; Drewing K; Kircher T; van Kemenade BM Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):3207-3216. PubMed ID: 28762054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural correlates of temporal recalibration to delayed auditory feedback of active and passive movements. Schmitter CV; Kufer K; Steinsträter O; Sommer J; Kircher T; Straube B Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Dec; 44(17):6227-6244. PubMed ID: 37818950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of visual feedback delay in active and passive self-body movements. Shimada S; Qi Y; Hiraki K Exp Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 201(2):359-64. PubMed ID: 19830411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early vestibular processing does not discriminate active from passive self-motion if there is a discrepancy between predicted and actual proprioceptive feedback. Brooks JX; Cullen KE J Neurophysiol; 2014 Jun; 111(12):2465-78. PubMed ID: 24671531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The neural correlates of perceiving one's own movements. Leube DT; Knoblich G; Erb M; Grodd W; Bartels M; Kircher TT Neuroimage; 2003 Dec; 20(4):2084-90. PubMed ID: 14683712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Watching your foot move--an fMRI study of visuomotor interactions during foot movement. Christensen MS; Lundbye-Jensen J; Petersen N; Geertsen SS; Paulson OB; Nielsen JB Cereb Cortex; 2007 Aug; 17(8):1906-17. PubMed ID: 17060367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When temporal prediction errs: ERP responses to delayed action-feedback onset. Pinheiro AP; Schwartze M; Gutierrez F; Kotz SA Neuropsychologia; 2019 Nov; 134():107200. PubMed ID: 31557484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seeing your own or someone else's hand moving in accordance with your action: The neural interaction of agency and hand identity. Uhlmann L; Pazen M; van Kemenade BM; Steinsträter O; Harris LR; Kircher T; Straube B Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Jun; 41(9):2474-2489. PubMed ID: 32090439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictability of visual perturbation during locomotion: implications for corrective efference copy signaling. Chagnaud BP; Simmers J; Straka H Biol Cybern; 2012 Dec; 106(11-12):669-79. PubMed ID: 23179256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting the sensory consequences of one's own action: First evidence for multisensory facilitation. van Kemenade BM; Arikan BE; Kircher T; Straube B Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2515-2526. PubMed ID: 27515031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive Sensing: The Role of Motor Signals in Sensory Processing. Brooks JX; Cullen KE Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging; 2019 Sep; 4(9):842-850. PubMed ID: 31401034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]