199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36057041)
1. Trends and gaps in biodiversity and ecosystem services research: A text mining approach.
Takacs V; O'Brien CD
Ambio; 2023 Jan; 52(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 36057041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Agriculture and forestry ecosystem services value in Guangzhou-Foshan Metropolitan Area under the background of urbanization, Southern China.].
Ye YQ; Zhang JE; Chen LL; Qin Z
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 May; 27(5):1619-1627. PubMed ID: 29732825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ecosystem services studies in Turkey: A national-scale review.
Başak E; Cetin NI; Vatandaşlar C; Pamukcu-Albers P; Karabulut AA; Çağlayan SD; Besen T; Erpul G; Balkız Ö; Çokçalışkan BA; Per E; Atkin G
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Oct; 844():157068. PubMed ID: 35787907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Seeds as natural capital.
Mattana E; Ulian T; Pritchard HW
Trends Plant Sci; 2022 Feb; 27(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 34556418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services and livelihoods in tropical landscapes: towards a common agenda.
Schroth G; McNeely JA
Environ Manage; 2011 Aug; 48(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 21706379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity.
Schröter M; Rusch GM; Barton DN; Blumentrath S; Nordén B
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112557. PubMed ID: 25393951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethnoagroforestry: integration of biocultural diversity for food sovereignty in Mexico.
Moreno-Calles AI; Casas A; Rivero-Romero AD; Romero-Bautista YA; Rangel-Landa S; Fisher-Ortíz RA; Alvarado-Ramos F; Vallejo-Ramos M; Santos-Fita D
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed; 2016 Nov; 12(1):54. PubMed ID: 27881142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Collateral biodiversity benefits associated with 'free-market' approaches to sustainable land use and forestry activities.
Koziell I; Swingland IR
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1807-16. PubMed ID: 12460499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ecosystem services from a degraded peatland of Central Kalimantan: implications for policy, planning, and management.
Law EA; Bryan BA; Meijaard E; Mallawaarachchi T; Struebig M; Wilson KA
Ecol Appl; 2015 Jan; 25(1):70-87. PubMed ID: 26255358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mapping the planet's critical areas for biodiversity and nature's contributions to people.
Neugarten RA; Chaplin-Kramer R; Sharp RP; Schuster R; Strimas-Mackey M; Roehrdanz PR; Mulligan M; van Soesbergen A; Hole D; Kennedy CM; Oakleaf JR; Johnson JA; Kiesecker J; Polasky S; Hanson JO; Rodewald AD
Nat Commun; 2024 Jan; 15(1):261. PubMed ID: 38199986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of human demand on conservation planning for biodiversity and ecosystem services.
Watson KB; Galford GL; Sonter LJ; Koh I; Ricketts TH
Conserv Biol; 2019 Aug; 33(4):942-952. PubMed ID: 30614054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anticipating changes in wildlife habitat induced by private forest owners' adaptation to climate change and carbon policy.
Hashida Y; Withey J; Lewis DJ; Newman T; Kline JD
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230525. PubMed ID: 32240191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interface processes between protected and unprotected areas: A global review and ways forward.
Blanco J; Bellón B; Fabricius C; de O Roque F; Pays O; Laurent F; Fritz H; Renaud PC
Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Mar; 26(3):1138-1154. PubMed ID: 31597213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conservation focus on Europe: major conservation policy issues that need to be informed by conservation science.
Pullin AS; Báldi A; Can OE; Dieterich M; Kati V; Livoreil B; Lövei G; Mihók B; Nevin O; Selva N; Sousa-Pinto I
Conserv Biol; 2009 Aug; 23(4):818-24. PubMed ID: 19627313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Projecting impacts of global climate and land-use scenarios on plant biodiversity using compositional-turnover modelling.
Di Marco M; Harwood TD; Hoskins AJ; Ware C; Hill SLL; Ferrier S
Glob Chang Biol; 2019 Aug; 25(8):2763-2778. PubMed ID: 31009149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The land use impacts of forestry and agricultural systems relative to natural vegetation; a fundamental energy dissipation approach.
Freer-Smith P; Muys B; Farrelly N; Drössler L; Minotta G
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Dec; 850():158000. PubMed ID: 35970455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reimagining infrastructure for a biodiverse future.
van Rees CB; Hernández-Abrams DD; Shudtz M; Lammers R; Byers J; Bledsoe BP; Bilskie MV; Calabria J; Chambers M; Dolatowski E; Ferreira S; Naslund L; Nelson DR; Nibbelink N; Suedel B; Tritinger A; Woodson CB; McKay SK; Wenger SJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Nov; 120(46):e2214334120. PubMed ID: 37931104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linking Attitudes, Policy, and Forest Cover Change in Buffer Zone Communities of Chitwan National Park, Nepal.
Stapp JR; Lilieholm RJ; Leahy J; Upadhaya S
Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 57(6):1292-303. PubMed ID: 26920157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of 'ecoagriculture' landscapes.
Scherr SJ; McNeely JA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Feb; 363(1491):477-94. PubMed ID: 17652072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Land use synergies and conflicts identification in the framework of compatibility analyses and spatial assessment of ecological, socio-cultural and economic values.
Kangas K; Brown G; Kivinen M; Tolvanen A; Tuulentie S; Karhu J; Markovaara-Koivisto M; Eilu P; Tarvainen O; Similä J; Juutinen A
J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 316():115174. PubMed ID: 35658267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
