These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36057564)

  • 1. International single-step SNPBLUP beef cattle evaluations for Limousin weaning weight.
    Bonifazi R; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J; Veerkamp RF; Michenet A; Savoia S; Cromie A; Vandenplas J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Sep; 54(1):57. PubMed ID: 36057564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
    Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration of beef cattle international pedigree and genomic estimated breeding values into national evaluations, with an application to the Italian Limousin population.
    Bonifazi R; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J; Veerkamp RF; Biffani S; Cassandro M; Savoia S; Vandenplas J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jun; 55(1):41. PubMed ID: 37308814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of direct-maternal genetic correlations on international beef cattle evaluations for Limousin weaning weight.
    Bonifazi R; Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34333640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of sub-setting the data of the main Limousin beef cattle population on the estimates of across-country genetic correlations.
    Bonifazi R; Vandenplas J; Napel JT; Matilainen K; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jun; 52(1):32. PubMed ID: 32576143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in genomic predictions when new information is added.
    Hidalgo J; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Miller S; Bermann M; Garcia ALS; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Feb; 99(2):. PubMed ID: 33544869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-step SNPBLUP evaluation in six German beef cattle breeds.
    Adekale D; Alkhoder H; Liu Z; Segelke D; Tetens J
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Sep; 140(5):496-507. PubMed ID: 37061869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework.
    Baller JL; Kachman SD; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32497209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a single-step with a multistep single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased predictor model for genomic evaluation of conformation traits in German Holsteins.
    Alkhoder H; Liu Z; Segelke D; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Apr; 105(4):3306-3322. PubMed ID: 35181130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SNP- and haplotype-based single-step genomic predictions for body weight, wool, and reproductive traits in North American Rambouillet sheep.
    Araujo AC; Carneiro PLS; Oliveira HR; Lewis RM; Brito LF
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Mar; 140(2):216-234. PubMed ID: 36408677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.
    Bussiman F; Chen CY; Holl J; Bermann M; Legarra A; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37584978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
    Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
    BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strategies for accommodating gene-edited sires and their descendants in genetic evaluations.
    Sanglard LP; See GM; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36897830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34390341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic clustering helps to improve prediction in a multibreed population.
    Ventura R; Larmer S; Schenkel FS; Miller SP; Sullivan P
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1844-56. PubMed ID: 27285682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data.
    Tonussi RL; Silva RMO; Magalhães AFB; Espigolan R; Peripolli E; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Chiaia HLJ; Pereira ASC; Lôbo RB; Bezerra LAF; Magnabosco CU; Lourenço DAL; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0181752. PubMed ID: 28957330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
    Gunia M; Saintilan R; Venot E; Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3258-69. PubMed ID: 24948648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.