These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36059666)
1. Robot-assisted esophagectomy may improve perioperative outcome in patients with esophageal cancer - a single-center experience. Betzler J; Elfinger L; Büttner S; Weiß C; Rahbari N; Betzler A; Reißfelder C; Otto M; Blank S; Schölch S Front Oncol; 2022; 12():966321. PubMed ID: 36059666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study. Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study. Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Short-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Cancer. Fujita T; Sato K; Ozaki A; Akutsu T; Fujiwara H; Kojima T; Daiko H World J Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(8):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 35499646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes. Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy. Xue M; Liu J; Lu M; Zhang H; Liu W; Tian H Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1293645. PubMed ID: 38288099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with side-to-side semi-mechanical anastomosis: analysis of a learning curve. Rebecchi F; Bonomo LD; Salzano A; Camandona M; Morino M Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):907-916. PubMed ID: 35403978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial. Yang Y; Li B; Yi J; Hua R; Chen H; Tan L; Li H; He Y; Guo X; Sun Y; Yu B; Li Z Ann Surg; 2022 Apr; 275(4):646-653. PubMed ID: 34171870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy. van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches. Kulkarni A; Mulchandani JG; Sadat MS; Shetty N; Shetty S; Kumar MP; Kudari A J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35044671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy). Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome. Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF; Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for thoracic lymph node dissection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparative cohort study. Lei J; Bai Y; Qiao Z; Ma J J Thorac Dis; 2024 Mar; 16(3):2115-2124. PubMed ID: 38617764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS. Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]